Teams

Boren

2026 Lubbock Adult League 55 & Over · 8.0 Senior Ladies

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-28vs PalmerLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Schroeder / Cenee Precure vs Kary Callen / Kimberly Lott2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Brack / Esmeralda Ivy vs Lynda Pouria / Maritza Palmer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-28vs PalmerLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Boren / Kathy Dannevik vs Kellye Sparkman / Claudia Bradley0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCenee Precure / Lisa Brack vs Kary Callen / Kimberly Lott5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMartha Schroeder / Esmeralda Ivy vs Lynda Pouria / Maritza Palmer4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-07vs PalmerLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Schroeder / Esmeralda Ivy vs Kellye Sparkman / Holly Snodgrass2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCenee Precure / Lisa Brack vs Lisa MacK / Maritza Palmer7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Boren / Laura Smith vs Kimberly Lott / Patty Rogers7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-07vs PalmerWon 21
W#1 DoublesEsmeralda Ivy / Martha Schroeder vs Patty Rogers / Lynda Pouria6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Brack / Cenee Precure vs Holly Snodgrass / Kellye Sparkman6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Boren / Laura Smith vs Kary Callen / Claudia Bradley0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Senior Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Cenee Precure
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Martha Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.88
Esmeralda Ivy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Amy Boren
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Lisa Brack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Kathy Dannevik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Esmeralda Ivy + Martha Schroeder224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Brack + Cenee Precure224 matchesnot enough data
Martha Schroeder + Cenee Precure213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cenee Precure
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.93
Martha Schroeder
16W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Esmeralda Ivy
17W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Amy Boren
15W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Brack
28W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.62
Kathy Dannevik
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.