Teams

RBW-Ohrbeck/Verma

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-15vs NWW-MI-HagstromLost 02
L#1 DoublesVietlong Le / Justin Low vs Curran Hagstrom / Robert Matthews1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndreas Ohrbeck / Chris Higashi vs Michael Fleming / Chad Dierickx2-6, 2-6
2026-03-15vs NTC-FogtLost 03
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Worthington vs Alex Greninger1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndreas Ohrbeck / Bruno Caiado vs Ross Laursen / Gregory Skaggs5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Low / Vijay Beniwal vs Daniel Halos / Kevin Tsay3-6, 5-7
2026-03-01vs CP-IyerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Worthington vs Qiming Jiang6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesViraj Desai / Vijay Beniwal vs Hao Dang / Adrian Cosma6-7, 1-6
2026-02-22vs NWW-MI-HagstromLost 01
L#3 DoublesBob Koch / Lam Nguyen vs Milt Reimers / Steven Dagg2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-15vs BC-SzeLost 12
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Worthington vs Clifford Flekser2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Donovan / Bruno Caiado vs Mario Lopez / Johan Bjorklund7-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlex Chen / Lam Nguyen vs Bally Bang / Geordie Sze6-2, 6-3
2026-02-01vs HBSQ-MannWon 21
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Worthington vs Christopher Sackmann3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVarun Verma / Lam Nguyen vs James Kim / Robert Mann6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJustin Low / Vietlong Le vs Jeff McKatims / Gavin Landon6-4, 7-6
2026-01-25vs NTC-FogtWon 20
W#1 SinglesBob Koch vs Arun Chokkalingam6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLam Nguyen / Varun Verma vs Aaron Coe / Evan Schmidt3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-01-18vs CP-IyerWon 21
W#1 SinglesBob Koch vs Aaron Song6-2, 2-5
L#2 DoublesAndreas Ohrbeck / Chris Higashi vs Lyle Li / Madhur Joshi7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBruno Caiado / Lam Nguyen vs Skanda Iyer / Qiming Jiang6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Nicholas Kaloudis
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.28
Andreas Ohrbeck
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.28
James Wonneberg
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Thomas Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.25
Varun Verma
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.19
Bob Koch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Richie Sugimoto
published 4.5
4.11
Jeffrey Worthington
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.00
Lam Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.97
Bruno Caiado
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.92
Christopher Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.91
Justin Low
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Vietlong Le
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Alex Chen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Chris Higashi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Viraj Desai
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.80
Vijay Beniwal
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruno Caiado + Varun Verma3353% games+5.6% vs expected
Vijay Beniwal + Viraj Desai352552% games+1.9% vs expected
Justin Low + Vietlong Le191851% games+1.2% vs expected
Chris Higashi + Andreas Ohrbeck2344% games−5.0% vs expected
Andreas Ohrbeck + Thomas Donovan161050% games−5.5% vs expected
Nicholas Kaloudis + Thomas Donovan134 matchesnot enough data
Andreas Ohrbeck + Varun Verma213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nicholas Kaloudis
42W–24L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Andreas Ohrbeck
104W–74L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
James Wonneberg
77W–68L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Thomas Donovan
72W–51L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Varun Verma
75W–43L career · 12 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Bob Koch
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Richie Sugimoto
52W–59L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Jeffrey Worthington
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
4.11
4
Lam Nguyen
74W–58L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Bruno Caiado
96W–66L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4.5
Christopher Lewis
50W–32L career · 9 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Justin Low
123W–90L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Vietlong Le
125W–45L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Alex Chen
65W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Chris Higashi
128W–76L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Viraj Desai
76W–36L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Vijay Beniwal
88W–62L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.