Teams

The Plantation - Mayer

2024 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Women - Summer · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-09vs Deerwood - DeNapoliLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Mindy Ezring vs Sarah Kambach / Melissa Ryan4-6, 1-6
2024-07-24vs Eagle Landing - BrinkWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Amber Moorman vs Eden Payton / Lan Nguyen6-3, 6-4
2024-07-18vs Southern Recreation Center - CookeLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Renee Callahan vs Natalie Beyer / Jeralyn Forcier0-6, 5-7
2024-06-27vs Williams Y - MurrayLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Renee Callahan vs Jenni Westbrook / Krista Murray1-6, 3-6
2024-06-20vs The Yards - JohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Amber Moorman vs Marla Lowry / Rosemarie Prokop1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-13vs Club Continental - PinhoLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenee Callahan / Cynthia Haines vs Elizabeth Donnelly / Kathleen Pinho5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Cynthia Haines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Amber Moorman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Brianne Toole
published 3.5
3.61
Amy Balsimo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.17
Mindy Ezring
published
3.02
Yulia Li
published
2.99
2.98
Renee Callahan
published
2.81
Heather Newby
published
2.75
Colleen Licata
published 3
2.72
Sheila Pensotti
published
Jane Freedman
published
Kathleen Sullivan
published
Kelly Valentine
published
Rachael Mayer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brianne Toole + Cynthia Haines4165% games+2.3% vs expected
Amber Moorman + Amy Balsimo7648% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Haines + Amy Balsimo404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Haines
127W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Amber Moorman
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brianne Toole
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
4
Amy Balsimo
28W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Mindy Ezring
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Yulia Li
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Deanna Leschinski
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Renee Callahan
2W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Heather Newby
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Colleen Licata
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
Sheila Pensotti
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Jane Freedman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Sullivan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Valentine
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachael Mayer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.