Teams

Marco YMCA / Washak

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-23vs Riverstone / MalletteSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Degasperi / Rachel Schenk vs Macey Tyll / Carrie Stowell3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMeg Perez / Dana Sacks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-03vs Heritage Bay / DelkWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarzenna Nowak / Rachel Schenk vs Rachael Klaas / Jae Marie Fry6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrea Washak / Melissa Degasperi vs Marie France McCloskey / Gretchen Landolt6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSindi Sanzica / Dana Sacks vs Alejandra Acuna / Lisa Vivori6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Hayden / Dana Sacks vs Abigail Freigang / Marie Shoaf1-6, 2-6
2025-02-10vs Heritage Bay / DelkWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Dana Sacks vs Alyssa Backman / Marie France McCloskey6-2, 6-4
2025-02-03vs Riverstone / MalletteSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCheryl Solimine / Rachel Schenk vs Eileen Valerio / Amanda Mallette6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Meg Perez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Durkin / Dana Sacks vs Abigail Freigang / Wendy Garber4-6, 0-6
2025-01-20vs Heritage Bay / DelkWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarzenna Nowak / Bernadette DiPino vs Kristen Catino / Shelley Boggess6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Schenk / Cheryl Solimine vs Marie France McCloskey / Karen Hole4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Maria Hayden vs Alejandra Acuna / Alexandra Fast0-6, 4-6
2025-01-13vs Riverstone / MalletteWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusanna Haedelt / Cheryl Solimine vs Megan MacKrory / Amanda Mallette5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Durkin / Dana Sacks vs Heather Christie / Kelly Stein6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Heinauer / Donna Digeronimo vs Chrissy Rogers / Kimberly DiStefano2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Perez / Dana Sacks vs Marie Shoaf / Diana Pleeter2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Susanna Haedelt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.03
Marzenna Nowak
published
3.95
Tonja Brewer
published 4
3.90
Bernadette DiPino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Cheryl Solimine
published 4
3.79
Ann Garvey
published 4
3.77
Rachel Schenk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Julie Cologero
published
3.74
Ann Heinauer
published 4
3.72
Melissa Degasperi
published
3.70
Donna Curry
published 4
3.69
Andrea Washak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Donna Digeronimo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Inge Lund
published 4
3.62
Meg Perez
published
3.53
Dana Sacks
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.52
Maria Hayden
published
3.50
Tricia McBride
published
3.50
Sindi Sanzica
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Jessica Durkin
published
Jennifer Ball
published
Mary Fischer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Schenk + Susanna Haedelt18462% games+11.8% vs expected
Bernadette DiPino + Andrea Washak471162% games+4.9% vs expected
Bernadette DiPino + Marzenna Nowak14462% games+4.8% vs expected
Marzenna Nowak + Cheryl Solimine5261% games+4.3% vs expected
Andrea Washak + Susanna Haedelt9653% games+2.3% vs expected
Rachel Schenk + Bernadette DiPino11464% games−1.5% vs expected
Donna Digeronimo + Dana Sacks8554% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Schenk + Andrea Washak4749% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Susanna Haedelt
180W–81L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
Marzenna Nowak
46W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Tonja Brewer
90W–62L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Bernadette DiPino
318W–110L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Cheryl Solimine
36W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Ann Garvey
78W–49L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
Rachel Schenk
139W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Julie Cologero
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Ann Heinauer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Melissa Degasperi
33W–44L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Donna Curry
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Andrea Washak
352W–306L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Donna Digeronimo
107W–91L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Inge Lund
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Meg Perez
90W–92L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 9 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Maria Hayden
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Tricia McBride
12W–28L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.50
Sindi Sanzica
104W–135L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jessica Durkin
26W–41L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.39
Jennifer Ball
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Fischer
122W–111L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.