Teams

MVH Hoffman SSL A18-4.0M

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-18vs WH Custodio SSL A18-4.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Buurma / Paul Hoffman vs William Hodgman / Erik Larsen2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRyan McFall vs Jeremy Nufer2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPaul Rutherford / Jose Vivas vs Lin Bao / Curtis Leibbrand4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-09vs WH Custodio SSL A18-4.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJerry Overbeek / Ray Buursma vs Ryan Langejans / Sean Lindsay1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesFelipe Santos vs Mike West5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesPaul Hoffman vs Lin Bao4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-27vs WH Custodio SSL A18-4.0MLost 03
L#1 SinglesPaul Hoffman vs Jeremy Andrick2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJerry Overbeek / Ray Buursma vs Curtis Leibbrand / Robert Padgett3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSteven Podgurski vs Metodi Ivanov7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Ryan McFall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.93
Daniel TerHaar
published 4
3.61
Albert O'Bryant
published 4
3.59
Steven Podgurski
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.49
Jose Vivas
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Ray Buursma
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Brian Buurma
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.14
Paul Rutherford
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Felipe Santos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jerry Overbeek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jorge Vazquez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Nathaniel McFall
published
Nick Labozzetta
published
Paul Hoffman
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Rutherford + Jose Vivas5749% games+5.2% vs expected
Brian Buurma + Jose Vivas191953% games+2.3% vs expected
Brian Buurma + Paul Hoffman0531% games−1.0% vs expected
Brian Buurma + Paul Rutherford0627% games−17.1% vs expected
Albert O'Bryant + Steven Podgurski224 matchesnot enough data
Steven Podgurski + Paul Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Jose Vivas + Jorge Vazquez213 matchesnot enough data
Jose Vivas + Paul Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan McFall
43W–54L career · 1 line in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Daniel TerHaar
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Albert O'Bryant
86W–82L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Steven Podgurski
96W–93L career · 1 line in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Jose Vivas
42W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
Ray Buursma
34W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Brian Buurma
32W–47L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Paul Rutherford
21W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Felipe Santos
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jerry Overbeek
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jorge Vazquez
20W–13L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nathaniel McFall
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nick Labozzetta
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Hoffman
14W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.