Teams

ELW Hueholt

2023 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-10vs SPTC PruettWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Gail Stallwood vs Melissa Wirt / Chris Pruett7-6, 5-4
2023-05-20vs Tarpon ColemanLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Turnbull / Lee Cucchi vs Gabriela Tanase / Wendy Burnette3-6, 6-7
2023-05-13vs Pinellas/Dunn/40&Over3.0WWon 20
W#2 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Gail Stallwood vs Tricia Lolkus / Amy Lovett Dunn6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Hueholt / Lee Cucchi vs Shannon David / Barbara Turi6-2, 7-6
2023-05-06vs RCSP FaraciWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Hueholt / Lee Cucchi vs Kristina Faraci / Judy Horvath6-3, 6-1
2023-04-29vs Seminole Lake JordanLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Gail Stallwood vs Valeska Dykes / Debra Edwards4-6, 5-7
2023-04-22vs Countryside CoyotesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLee Cucchi / Kimberly Ankney vs Betsy Rutkowski / Dana Galbraith6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-08vs Countryside CoyotesLost 01
L#3 DoublesMonique Sola / Lee Cucchi vs Michele Weinstock / Callee Lepley2-6, 5-7
2023-04-01vs Pinellas/Dunn/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Gail Stallwood vs Anne Marie Lennox / Marisol Cohen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Robyn Houston
published
2.73
Lee Cucchi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Frances Skinner
published
2.67
Monique Sola
published
2.67
2.57
Kimberly Ankney
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.51
Colleen Bebell
published 3
Elizabeth Spriggs
published
Gail Stallwood
published
Mary Turnbull
published
Svetlana Bondareva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Houston + Lee Cucchi7556% games−1.4% vs expected
Lee Cucchi + Kimberly Ankney2644% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Houston + Kimberly Ankney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robyn Houston
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Lee Cucchi
53W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Frances Skinner
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Monique Sola
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Christine Hueholt
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Kimberly Ankney
76W–159L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Colleen Bebell
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Elizabeth Spriggs
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gail Stallwood
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Frances Warford
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Turnbull
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Svetlana Bondareva
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.