Teams

MCAC:Stevens:Stevens/Vojtasova

2024 Cape Tri-Level 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women 1

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-07vs MCAC:Mousseau:MousseauLost 01
L#1 DoublesSoraya Stevens / Emily Miller vs Kristina Mousseau / Gail Cohen4-6, 4-5
2024-11-23vs MCAC:Harris:HarrisWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Majewski / Ann Cami vs Audrey Gandini / Lauren Labelle6-2, 6-1
2024-11-09vs MCAC:Lewis:Lewis/SwanseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Majewski / Ann Cami vs Kathleen Lewis / Lisa Swansey6-2, 6-2
2024-10-26vs MCAC:Dinius:DiniusWon 10
W#1 DoublesSoraya Stevens / Emily Miller vs Anne-Marie Dinius / Deanna Waldron6-2, 6-2
2024-10-19vs MCAC:Harris:HarrisWon 10
W#1 DoublesSoraya Stevens / Jana Vojtasova vs Kim Sullivan / Nancy Whitehurst6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-12vs MCAC:Mousseau:MousseauLost 01
L#1 DoublesSoraya Stevens / Emily Miller vs Kristina Mousseau / Jeanne Bissonnette6-6
2024-10-05vs MCAC:Lewis:Lewis/SwanseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Majewski / Jana Vojtasova vs Amy Peacock / Lisa Swansey6-0, 6-4
2024-09-21vs MCAC:Dinius:DiniusWon 10
W#1 DoublesSoraya Stevens / Jana Vojtasova vs Anne-Marie Dinius / Vera Sichko6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Mousseau:Mousseau7171345
2MCAC:Stevens:Stevens/Vojtasova6262552
3MCAC:Lewis:Lewis/Swansey5353659
4MCAC:Harris:Harris16161279
5MCAC:Dinius:Dinius07071479

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jennifer Majewski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ann Cami
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jana Vojtasova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Soraya Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Soraya Stevens + Jana Vojtasova303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Majewski
56W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Ann Cami
7W–6L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jana Vojtasova
47W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Soraya Stevens
61W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.