Teams

EW-CBRC-Foss/Coles

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-15vs CBRC-PorterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Theresa Koehler vs Angela Cragin / Scot Hymas6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Chandler / Candee Foss vs David Porter / Heidi Bucheli4-6, 4-6
2026-08-15vs PC-Hit and RunWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Chandler / Candee Foss vs ARLENE CUSTER / Lawrence Shepherd6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Theresa Koehler vs Chris Denney / Marnae Collins6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-14vs PC-Hit and RunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Theresa Koehler vs ARLENE CUSTER / Lawrence Shepherd6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJames Chandler / Candee Foss vs Marnae Collins / Chris Denney5-7, 3-6
2026-08-14vs CBRC-PorterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarry Vedder / Anne Neuberger vs Daniel Cragin / Heidi Bucheli4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Candee Foss vs David Porter / Lory Allen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Bryan Coles
published 3.5
2.88
Larry Bagaasen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Anne Neuberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Candee Foss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Theresa Koehler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
James Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Michael Jacoby
published 3
2.63
Barry Vedder
published 3
Amy Hoins
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Chandler + Candee Foss6453% games−3.7% vs expected
Theresa Koehler + Larry Bagaasen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryan Coles
38W–48L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Larry Bagaasen
30W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Anne Neuberger
55W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Candee Foss
27W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Theresa Koehler
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
James Chandler
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Michael Jacoby
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Barry Vedder
10W–16L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
2.5
Amy Hoins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.