Teams

Elysium

2024 FALL Combo · 2024 Fall 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · 2024 Fall 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racquet Club 37016510159
2Racquet Club 15317719163
3Racquet Club 443101125201
4Elysium3591532234
5Olympic0851941269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Meredith Garth
published
2.55
Amy Niekamp
published 3
2.48
Pat Halsey
published
2.36
Corinne Rogers
published 2.5
2.34
Kara Casey
published
2.15
Jennifer Lutz
published
1.80
Judith Kander
published
Emily Iddings
published
Jennifer Houser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Niekamp + Kara Casey4558% games+7.8% vs expected
Jennifer Houser + Judith Kander4938% games−2.5% vs expected
Jennifer Houser + Kara Casey3257% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Houser + Corinne Rogers033 matchesnot enough data
Corinne Rogers + Amy Niekamp123 matchesnot enough data
Emily Iddings + Amy Niekamp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Garth
64W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.96
3
Amy Niekamp
51W–66L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.55
Pat Halsey
57W–60L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Corinne Rogers
13W–41L career · no lines in 2024
0%83%17%
2.36
Kara Casey
50W–66L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.34
Jennifer Lutz
29W–81L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.15
Judith Kander
21W–72L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.80
Emily Iddings
27W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Houser
26W–62L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.