Teams

SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Stow (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer - SD · SD - Women - WD 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-06-18vs SD LLW 4.0 LJTC/ BourneLost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Nichols / Jennifer Brady vs Christine Golemb / Janene Christopher1-6, 4-6
2021-06-04Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRandie Lettington / Shelley Federhart vs Lorine Honeyman / Jill Moore Sugar4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Stow / Carri Burns vs Donna Berwanger / Leslie Evans2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Shelley Federhart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Sami Martinez
published 4
Annette Sandage
published 4
Carri Burns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Soledad Ramirez
published 4
3.61
Carol Diggs
published 4
3.58
Jennie Blacker
published 4
3.50
Jennifer Brady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Carol Harris
published 4
3.31
Christina Stow
published 3.5
3.20
Annie Chambers
published 3.5
3.20
Mary Greif
published 3.5
3.11
Tracy Skaddan
published
Roselynn Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carri Burns + Jennifer Brady291556% games+10.2% vs expected
Soledad Ramirez + Sami Martinez5653% games−2.6% vs expected
Soledad Ramirez + Jennie Blacker2548% gamesnot enough data
Soledad Ramirez + Jennifer Brady3251% gamesnot enough data
Jennie Blacker + Carol Harris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shelley Federhart
61W–74L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Sami Martinez
33W–31L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Annette Sandage
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Carri Burns
65W–38L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Soledad Ramirez
114W–102L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carol Diggs
22W–38L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Jennie Blacker
37W–54L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Brady
112W–78L career · 1 line in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Carol Harris
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Christina Stow
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Annie Chambers
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Mary Greif
7W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.20
Tracy Skaddan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Roselynn Brown
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.