Teams

Conway

2025 Neb. Mixed 18&Over · 6.0 Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-18vs NE/DarlingGoldapp/18&Over6.0XSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPeter Frei / Candace Huebert vs Heather Siebken / Jordan Evans6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Bost / Adrian Blake vs LiQin Kephart / Arnie Ovalles1-6, 3-6
2025-07-11vs NE/DarlingGoldapp/18&Over6.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohnny Hass / Candace Huebert vs James Farley / Rachel Hall1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeff VanRoy / Billie Dixon vs Austin Deupree / Brittany Deupree1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah McDill / Alexander Adkins vs Chad Redding / Stephanie Nelson6-7, 3-6
2025-06-26vs NE/DarlingGoldapp/18&Over6.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohnny Hass / Jackie Conway vs Nick Sowl / Sydney Sowl1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Autera / Maddie Keeling vs Chad Redding / Stephanie Nelson7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJeff VanRoy / Candace Huebert vs James Farley / Rachel Hall0-6, 1-6
2025-06-20vs NE/DarlingGoldapp/18&Over6.0XLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff VanRoy / Erin Foley vs Nick Sowl / Sydney Sowl6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAdrian Blake / Abbie Raikes vs Austin Deupree / Brittany Deupree1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Wills / Deborah McDill vs Jordan Evans / Heather Siebken6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-13vs NE/DarlingGoldapp/18&Over6.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexander Adkins / Erin Foley vs Nick Sowl / Sydney Sowl2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdrian Blake / Billie Dixon vs Jordan Evans / LiQin Kephart5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeff VanRoy / Rachel Bost vs Kyle Darling / Rachel Hall7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-06-06vs NE/DarlingGoldapp/18&Over6.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Frei / Candace Huebert vs Sri Vijay Yellepeddi / LiQin Kephart7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff VanRoy / Erin Foley vs Kyle Darling / Nicolette Diamantis6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJohnny Hass / Billie Dixon vs Austin Deupree / Brittany Deupree1-6, 1-6
2025-05-30vs NE/DarlingGoldapp/18&Over6.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesCandace Huebert / Jeff VanRoy vs Rachel Hall / James Farley3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Smith / Adrian Blake vs LiQin Kephart / Sri Vijay Yellepeddi1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Conway / Johnny Hass vs Stephanie Nelson / Kyle Darling7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/DarlingGoldapp/18&Over6.0X5214716149
2Conway2571429213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jeff VanRoy
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.25
Jackie Conway
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Candace Huebert
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.14
Maddie Keeling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Adrian Blake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Deborah McDill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Johnny Hass
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Billie Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Abbie Raikes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Alexander Adkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Erin Foley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Peter Frei
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Bost
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ryan Wills
published
Tyler Autera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Conway + Jeff VanRoy2349% gamesnot enough data
Adrian Blake + Erin Foley213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Foley + Jeff VanRoy303 matchesnot enough data
Billie Dixon + Jeff VanRoy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff VanRoy
33W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Jackie Conway
40W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Candace Huebert
32W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Maddie Keeling
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Adrian Blake
32W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Deborah McDill
57W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Johnny Hass
3W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Billie Dixon
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Abbie Raikes
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Alexander Adkins
10W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Erin Foley
26W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Frei
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Bost
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Wills
9W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Autera
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.