Teams

WNCK Owens (HRC)

Combo 55 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 55+ Women 7.5 Combo Sat

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-22vs WNCT Walker (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Dunn / Sheri Sparks vs Susan Chase / Rebecca Carchman0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeanette Wayne / Sally Gauntlett vs Sherrie Voyles / Susan Watson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarian Wood / Deborah Rogers vs Susan Cook / Annie Lundahl4-6, 1-6
2026-08-15vs WNCJ Sweezey (Aston)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Boyle / Donna Remenar vs Pamela Harris / Theresa Hash3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristy Owens / Marian Wood vs Tricia Reeks / Dorothy Singhal1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeanette Wayne / Sally Gauntlett vs Jodi Shainberg / Lynne Weinrib1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 55+ Women 7.5 Combo Sat
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCT Walker (Aston Park)1030011
2WNCK Owens (HRC)0103636
3WNCB Cook (HRC)0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Cynthia Boyle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Jennifer Kersey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kelli Wood
published
3.18
Kristy Owens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Jennifer Profili
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Susan Baum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Sheri Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Sally Gauntlett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Donna Remenar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanette Wayne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marian Wood
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Gauntlett + Jennifer Profili033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Boyle
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jennifer Kersey
27W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Kelli Wood
10W–16L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Kristy Owens
16W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Jennifer Profili
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Susan Baum
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Sheri Sparks
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Sally Gauntlett
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.85
Donna Remenar
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jeanette Wayne
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marian Wood
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Dunn
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.