Teams

CP:Ageless Wonders:das Neves

2024 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 8.0 55 & Over Women - 1

24 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-28vs CP:Women Who Lunch: BarnwellWon 30
W#1 DoublesVenus Jones / Tracie Cronin vs Laura Saggese / Ondrea Schiciano6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarisa Mcdonald / Devon Delaney vs Janet Muller / Kim Mixer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Silberfein / Nanci Kirshner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesVenus Jones / Tracie Cronin vs JoAnn Lopez / Kristin Sabatini2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Kienzle / Dawn Hone vs Barbara Kiselak / Audra Edele6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDevon Delaney / Berry Ravitz vs Karen Cushnie / Julie Sterling6-3, 7-6
2024-06-30vs KH:Age Advantage:GaillardSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFelicia DeSanto / Dawn Hone vs Celia Ponvert / Teresa Panico3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDevon Delaney / Michele Halem vs Katarzyna Jarmoc Rakowski / Wendy Hyer1-6, 6-4
2024-06-08vs CP:Women Who Lunch: BarnwellLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Dawson / Felicia DeSanto vs Pamela Fuehrer / Laura Saggese3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMaria Das Neves / Jan Strack vs Ondrea Schiciano / Leslie Lombino7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Ryan-Gartrell / Susanne Sparks vs Deborah Barnwell / Ann Horowitz6-4, 3-5
L#1 DoublesMichele Halem / Patricia Rube vs Barbara Kiselak / Audra Edele4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Ryan-Gartrell / Felicia DeSanto vs Ellen O'Donnell / Sue Broderick5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Duffy / Marisa Mcdonald vs Karen Cushnie / Julie Sterling6-4, 6-1
2024-05-05vs KH:Age Advantage:GaillardLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Dawson / Venus Jones vs Eileen Frattaroli / Francesca Loricco3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Halem / Kelly Ryan-Gartrell vs Kendal Gaillard / Mallory Close4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDevon Delaney / Millyn Gaaserud vs Cheryl Levine / Celia Ponvert2-6, 4-4
2024-04-07vs CP:Women Who Lunch: BarnwellWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Dawson / Dawn Hone vs Leslie Lombino / Kristen Woll7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Duffy / Marisa Mcdonald vs Ann Horowitz / Terri Stein4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Das Neves / Melani Lust vs Evelyn Hagenow / Hildi Todrin7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBerry Ravitz / Michele Halem vs Nanette Koryn / Polly Edwards3-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusanne Sparks / Kelly Ryan-Gartrell vs Karen Cushnie / Audra Edele2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDevon Delaney / Millyn Gaaserud vs Ellen O'Donnell / Deirdre Andreoli3-6, 5-7
2024-03-09vs KH:Age Advantage:GaillardLost 12
L#1 DoublesVenus Jones / Margaret Kienzle vs Kendal Gaillard / Eileen Frattaroli1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCandace Jemiolo / Frances Desouza vs Wendy Hyer / Cheryl Levine2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Dawson / Dawn Hone vs Mallory Close / Christine Juneau6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 55 & Over Women - 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Marjorie Eilertsen
published
3.78
Venus Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Dawson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Candace Jemiolo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Amy Silberfein
published 4
3.73
Felicia DeSanto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Dawn Hone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Deborah Salomon
published 4
3.65
Millyn Gaaserud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Jan Strack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Kelly Ryan-Gartrell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Lisa Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Nanci Kirshner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Michele Halem
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Devon Delaney
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Berry Ravitz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Susanne Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Frances Desouza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Maria Das Neves
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Margaret Kienzle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marisa Mcdonald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melani Lust
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Rube
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tracie Cronin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Kienzle + Lisa Dawson6167% games+10.9% vs expected
Venus Jones + Lisa Dawson211455% games+3.3% vs expected
Felicia DeSanto + Lisa Dawson271653% games+2.7% vs expected
Jan Strack + Venus Jones8160% games+2.6% vs expected
Dawn Hone + Berry Ravitz271753% games+2.5% vs expected
Melani Lust + Devon Delaney81148% games+1.8% vs expected
Dawn Hone + Margaret Kienzle12755% games+1.8% vs expected
Nanci Kirshner + Deborah Salomon141454% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marjorie Eilertsen
123W–84L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Venus Jones
175W–145L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Lisa Dawson
178W–134L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Candace Jemiolo
34W–69L career · 1 line in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Amy Silberfein
15W–46L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Felicia DeSanto
212W–167L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Dawn Hone
224W–150L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Deborah Salomon
75W–85L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Millyn Gaaserud
63W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Jan Strack
141W–106L career · 1 line in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
Kelly Ryan-Gartrell
100W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lisa Duffy
16W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Nanci Kirshner
93W–105L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Michele Halem
45W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Devon Delaney
37W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Berry Ravitz
175W–103L career · 2 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Susanne Sparks
132W–210L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Frances Desouza
23W–56L career · 1 line in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.36
3.5
Maria Das Neves
159W–120L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Margaret Kienzle
69W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marisa Mcdonald
33W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melani Lust
21W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Rube
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tracie Cronin
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.