Teams

Davis/Nashville

2026 Mixed 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Mixed - Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-18vs Payne/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKarl Kern / Cathy Radig vs Albert Whitson / Laurie Passmore4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCameron Crain / Tammy Shrivalle vs David Harvey / Shannon Fox6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-11vs Zhang/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesCathy Radig / Cameron Crain vs Caroline Browder / Mark Rosenthal6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Pearce / Jeff Mullins vs Kathleen Malchow / Rod Baine3-6, 1-6
2026-06-20vs Payne/NashvilleLost 02
L#2 DoublesTammy Shrivalle / Cameron Crain vs Liz Daney / Ryan Cluff6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesConnie Pearce / Wade Shrivalle vs Wendy Rogers / Matt McCord2-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs Zhang/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesTricia Davis / Cameron Crain vs Girish Hiremath / Kathleen Malchow7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Mullins / Cathy Radig vs Xianghu Qu / Donna Cox2-6, 1-6
2026-05-30vs Payne/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesCameron Crain / Tammy Shrivalle vs Jeff Ammerman / Shannon Fox3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed - Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Tricia Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Tammy Shrivalle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Connie Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Cathy Radig
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
2.88
Wade Shrivalle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karl Kern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Shrivalle + Wade Shrivalle3547% games+6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tricia Davis
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Tammy Shrivalle
67W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Connie Pearce
11W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Cathy Radig
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Candice Alexander
8W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Wade Shrivalle
17W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Karl Kern
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.