Teams

Lakes/Buckalew-Criswell W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

25 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Duong / Lindsey McDavid vs Rebecca Neal / Amy Dungan3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Sanella Wertz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.85
Christie Smith
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.84
Karen Buckalew
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Sarah Wollitz
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.76
Julie Hoang
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.73
April Parker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
Julia Duong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Rosalyn Luong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Ryane Criswell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Heather Helsel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Lindsey McDavid
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Teri Doyle
published
3.49
Michelle Buchanan
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.48
Erika Meade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Kristi Flanagan
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Tracy Constantino
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Christie Rymsza
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Elizabeth Maurice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Jennifer Deaton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.25
Paige Green
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Thota
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kate Chalupa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marge Goodman
published
Sunny Hwang
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Quill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Wollitz + Christie Smith3445% games+7.0% vs expected
Ryane Criswell + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Rosalyn Luong + Julia Duong134 matchesnot enough data
Rosalyn Luong + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Wollitz + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Sanella Wertz + Jessica Thota134 matchesnot enough data
Ryane Criswell + Sarah Wollitz213 matchesnot enough data
Teri Doyle + Tracy Constantino033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanella Wertz
9W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4.5
Christie Smith
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.85
Karen Buckalew
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Sarah Wollitz
21W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Julie Hoang
39W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
April Parker
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Julia Duong
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Rosalyn Luong
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Ryane Criswell
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Heather Helsel
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Lindsey McDavid
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Teri Doyle
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Michelle Buchanan
16W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Erika Meade
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Kristi Flanagan
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
Tracy Constantino
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Christie Rymsza
14W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Elizabeth Maurice
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Jennifer Deaton
20W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Paige Green
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Jessica Thota
13W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate Chalupa
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marge Goodman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sunny Hwang
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Quill
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.