Teams

Minorca Aces

2026 Volusia Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-12vs FTC SlicesWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlicya Simmons / Ivich Neuville vs Jodi Manning / Lisa Cutten4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Norris / Katherine Pace vs Karen Hisert / Tracey Klein6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBettina Fulford / Daniela Cramer vs Cathy Sejansky / Marsha Wall6-4, 6-2
2026-05-29vs FTC SlicesLost 03
L#1 DoublesFranci Davis / Daniela Cramer vs Jodi Manning / Lisa Cutten3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Norris / Katherine Pace vs Karen Payne / Tracey Klein0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIvich Neuville / Bettina Fulford vs Cathy Sejansky / Marsha Wall4-6, 5-7
2026-05-26vs FTC SlicesLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Johnson / Janet Hogan vs Karen Hisert / Tracey Klein6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlicya Simmons / Franci Davis vs Jodi Manning / Lisa Cutten5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Pace / Daniela Cramer vs Karen Payne / Marsha Wall2-6, 4-6
2026-05-15vs FTC SlicesWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Johnson / Janet Hogan vs Cathy Sejansky / Lisa Cutten6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Norris / Katherine Pace vs Karen Payne / Marsha Wall7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesFranci Davis / Ivich Neuville vs Karen Hisert / Tracey Klein3-6, 2-6
2026-05-01vs FTC SlicesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelley Broome / Katherine Pace vs Jodi Manning / Lisa Cutten1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFranci Davis / Ivich Neuville vs Karen Payne / Tracey Klein2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Norris / Janet Hogan vs Karen Hisert / Marsha Wall6-0, 6-0
2026-04-24vs FTC SlicesLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniela Cramer / Mary Pando vs Jodi Manning / Lisa Cutten1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLaura Norris / Alicya Simmons vs Cathy Sejansky / Marsha Wall6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Johnson / Bettina Fulford vs Karen Payne / Rose Lucas6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-17vs FTC SlicesWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Johnson / Daniela Cramer vs Karen Hisert / Marsha Wall0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlicya Simmons / Janet Hogan vs Cathy Sejansky / Rose Lucas6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Pando / Bettina Fulford vs Lisa Cutten / Tracey Klein1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Alicya Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.24
Beth Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Bettina Fulford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniela Cramer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Franci Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ivich Neuville
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Janet Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Katherine Pace
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Kelley Broome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Norris
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Pando
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Norris + Katherine Pace213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alicya Simmons
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
3.5
Beth Johnson
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Bettina Fulford
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Daniela Cramer
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Franci Davis
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ivich Neuville
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Hogan
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Pace
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelley Broome
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Laura Norris
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Pando
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.