Teams

REFUND 2(REFUNDED)

USTA FLEX LEAGUE -- SEASON VI -- DOES NOT AFFECT NTRP (A) · x 1REFUND - FULL(REFUNDED)

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · x 1REFUND - FULL(REFUNDED)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1REFUND 1(REFUNDED)000000
2REFUND 2(REFUNDED)000000
3V/P Wang - KC(REFUNDED)000000
4Heather Young000000
5Kristin Walters000000
6REFUND 3(REFUNDED)000000
7Ernest Reece000000
8Steve Young(REFUNDED)000000
9Christopher Gilbert000000
10David Milliken000000
11Dagmar Velez000000
12Jennifer Garbiso Hall000000
13Kelsey Pobanz000000
14Lina Reznicek-Parrado000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erica Nollen
published 4
3.29
Aimee Petri
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 63%, also #1 Female Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.72
Suzy Farrell
published 3
2.57
Kristina Klug
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Kerstyn Farrell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Petri + Elizabeth Grevengoed17167% games+10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Grevengoed
49W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Erica Nollen
64W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Aimee Petri
136W–73L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3
Suzy Farrell
33W–60L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Kristina Klug
37W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Kerstyn Farrell
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.