Teams

PRC - Vandy

2026 B'ham Combo - 18 & Over - Weeknight · 5.5 Women - Monday Evening

12 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-17vs Riverchase - HutchisonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMorgan Vanlandingham / La Watters Hunter vs Katie Hutchison / Donna Bagwell3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Crandall / Kathrin Eberle vs Amy Mudano / Monica Fischer5-7, 4-6
2026-08-10vs HCC - TessinLost 12
L#1 DoublesJuanita Gooden / Katie Crandall vs Sarah Johnson / Lena Martinez5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGail Bevier / Morgan Vanlandingham vs Elizabeth Miller / Rachael Josey6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLa Watters Hunter / Rebecca Conwell vs Mariah Alfano / Lindsey Tessin2-6, 1-6
2026-08-03vs Riverchase - RodgersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJuanita Gooden / Morgan Vanlandingham vs Maggie Hall / Kelly Saunders6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLa Watters Hunter / Katherine Dearing vs Merideth Rodgers / Sam Branch4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica VanLandingham / Leah OGwynn vs Kimberly Woodall / Jaclyn Langan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-27vs West Homewood - HancockLost 02
L#1 DoublesJuanita Gooden / Katherine Dearing vs Deana Hughes / Elizabeth Gray3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Conwell / Leah OGwynn vs Sara Boney / Audrey Hirschy3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women - Monday Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Juanita Gooden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Gail Bevier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Sara Langston
published
2.50
Leah OGwynn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Morgan Vanlandingham
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.38
La Watters Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Katie Crandall
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.31
Rebecca Conwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.25
Jessica VanLandingham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Katherine Dearing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.08
Kathrin Eberle
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jennifer Odom
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Conwell + Katie Crandall4448% games+5.9% vs expected
La Watters Hunter + Gail Bevier1635% games−1.2% vs expected
Katie Crandall + Morgan Vanlandingham5250% games−1.6% vs expected
La Watters Hunter + Leah OGwynn2641% games−3.3% vs expected
Gail Bevier + Juanita Gooden134 matchesnot enough data
Gail Bevier + Leah OGwynn033 matchesnot enough data
Katie Crandall + Kathrin Eberle033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juanita Gooden
33W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Gail Bevier
15W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Sara Langston
4W–16L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Leah OGwynn
14W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Morgan Vanlandingham
19W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
La Watters Hunter
12W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Katie Crandall
16W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Rebecca Conwell
8W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Jessica VanLandingham
5W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Katherine Dearing
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Kathrin Eberle
0W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Jennifer Odom
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.