Teams

SH - Garner

Mixed Doubles 55 & Over - Invitational · 4.0 - 4 Team Draw

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 - 4 Team Draw
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SH - Garner000000
2MO- Sands/Mikkelsen000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
David Bachofer
published 4
3.65
Sharon Garrison
published
3.54
Stanley Posey
published
3.52
Edwin Garner Jr
published
3.37
Jana Killen
published
3.15
Donna Garner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Garner + Edwin Garner Jr0632% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Bachofer
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Sharon Garrison
103W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.65
Stanley Posey
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
Edwin Garner Jr
13W–21L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jana Killen
55W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Donna Garner
8W–23L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.