Teams

Leslie's Team #2

2023 Adult 55 and Over League · 9.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-21vs Leslie's TeamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Stanley-Hunt / Maylynn Ikioka vs Caroline Gammie / Mona Decrinis6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Jill Kanahele vs Cynthia Feike / Sachi Triolo2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-14vs Leslie's TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Stanley-Hunt / Maylynn Ikioka vs Rachel Christopher / Caroline Gammie4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Kanahele / Deanna DiBiase vs Cynthia Feike / Mona Decrinis5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSachi Triolo / Leslie Haughney vs Debra Orton / Lory Kaufman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-07vs Leslie's TeamLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Funai / Debbie Montgomery vs Karen Sullivan / Deborah Sawyer3-6, 5-7
2023-04-29vs Leslie's TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Kanahele / Maylynn Ikioka vs Rachel Christopher / Ruby Matsui3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRita Ingstad / Leslie Haughney vs Lory Kaufman / Debra Orton6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-23vs Leslie's TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelanie Brown / Jill Kanahele vs Rachel Christopher / Ruby Matsui5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Funai / Debbie Montgomery vs Karen Sullivan / Deborah Sawyer4-6, 3-6
2023-04-15vs Leslie's TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaylynn Ikioka / Debbie Montgomery vs Cynthia Feike / Ruby Matsui3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJill Kanahele / Leslie Wilshusen vs Leslie Haughney / Tracy Halbersleben6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
3.90
Maylynn Ikioka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Deanna DiBiase
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.89
Jill Kanahele
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Debra Orton
published 4
3.74
Debbie Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Leslie Haughney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Cynthia Funai
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Kristine Oyama
published 4
3.60
Jeanne Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Juliana Massenburg
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.28
Leslie Wilshusen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lory Kaufman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Kanahele + Deanna DiBiase231259% games+8.0% vs expected
Cynthia Funai + Deanna DiBiase7452% games+4.4% vs expected
Jeanne Dunn + Juliana Massenburg1640% games+0.8% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Jill Kanahele10454% games−0.6% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Deanna DiBiase2351% gamesnot enough data
Kristine Oyama + Jill Kanahele5057% gamesnot enough data
Maylynn Ikioka + Cynthia Funai404 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Dunn + Kristine Oyama044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Maylynn Ikioka
109W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Deanna DiBiase
144W–107L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–166L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Debra Orton
5W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Debbie Montgomery
154W–103L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Leslie Haughney
80W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Cynthia Funai
93W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Kristine Oyama
47W–47L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Jeanne Dunn
46W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Juliana Massenburg
37W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Leslie Wilshusen
46W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Lory Kaufman
27W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.