Teams

Ysidron 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-25vs Kirby 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngela Greene / Liz Busch vs Linda Hestenes / Mariann Van Ryen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Ysidron / Andrea Hayes vs Robyn Manning / Sue Ann Lapp7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Simpkins / Susan Shughart vs Margaret Joseph / Cindy Cooke2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesRose Chrismon / Angela Greene vs Dionne Holden / Lee Varner1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEvie Curley / Susan Shughart vs Gail Terrell / Mary Winstead6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Simpkins / Spring Walsh vs Elia Mavronikolas / Jennifer M Riley2-6, 0-6
2026-08-04vs Pressley 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PmLost 03
L#1 DoublesRose Chrismon / Angela Greene vs Hayes Mills / Lorri Stephenson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzi Jackson / Gail Tomarchio vs Amy Dulin / Lara Heberle7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGayle Taylordean / Sandra Simpkins vs Rhonda Glenn / Karen Geiselhart4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 6.5 Women 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Clancy 55s 6.5W Combo W Fri AM3081450
2Kirby 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM2051344
3Collins 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AM2154870
4Berreth/Herron 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM2163966
5Pressley 55s 6.5W Combo Tues Pm1030224
6White/Redding 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM1142648
7Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM12451081
8MacFadden 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM12451288
9Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM000000
10Shivaji 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103631
11Rhyne/Gorham 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103635
12Ysidron 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103636
13Wolff 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM030918106

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Angela Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Andrea Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Gail Tomarchio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Evie Curley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Kathy Conner
published
2.77
Liz Busch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Suzi Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Deborah Ysidron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Gayle Taylordean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Sandra Simpkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Susan Shughart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Spring Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Ysidron + Evie Curley213 matchesnot enough data
Liz Busch + Evie Curley303 matchesnot enough data
Suzi Jackson + Gail Tomarchio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Angela Greene
22W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Andrea Hayes
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Gail Tomarchio
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Evie Curley
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Kathy Conner
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Liz Busch
21W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Suzi Jackson
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Deborah Ysidron
15W–24L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Gayle Taylordean
10W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Sandra Simpkins
11W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Susan Shughart
11W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Spring Walsh
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.