Teams

WW-Lemco

2021 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-28vs MAC-BatesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLonnie Lemco / Kacie Painter vs Amadeus Malheiros / Anne Wolff6-3, 6-1
2021-03-21vs ACAC-FoleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesKacie Painter / John Waite vs Dave Booth / Jennifer Booth7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2021-02-20vs MTC-DelaneyWon 10
W#3 DoublesLonnie Lemco / Caren Payne vs Susan Ferrell / Luke Vanworkum6-0, 6-1
2021-02-06vs MAC-JohnstonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Mullahy / Kacie Painter vs Lisa Johnson / Colton Johnson7-5, 4-1
L#3 DoublesCaren Payne / Bernie Niemeier vs Katie Hambrick / Erich Yost3-6, 2-6
2021-01-16vs RAIN-EarleWon 10
W#1 DoublesKacie Painter / Christopher Hester vs James Murphy / Frances Petres6-0, 6-2
2021-01-09vs SAL-GrayWon 20
W#1 DoublesLonnie Lemco / Caren Payne vs Tara Hudson / David Hudson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBernie Niemeier / Kacie Painter vs Stacey Gray / Charles Gray6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Brian Rabhan
published 4
3.55
Kacie Painter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.36
James Mullahy
published 3.5
Christopher Hester
published 3.5
3.18
Christine Holt
published 3.5
3.04
Lonnie Lemco
published
3.03
Bradley Stovall
published 3.5
2.99
Caren Payne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Renee Gilman
published
2.62
Katrin Wilcox
published
2.57
Bernie Niemeier
published 3
Travis Bohn
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Rabhan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.95
Kacie Painter
199W–63L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
James Mullahy
22W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Christopher Hester
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Christine Holt
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Lonnie Lemco
13W–29L career · no lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Bradley Stovall
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–68L career · 9 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
Renee Gilman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.97
Katrin Wilcox
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Bernie Niemeier
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
2.57
Travis Bohn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.