Teams

Ltc - Gaela

2022 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Wallach / Edward Gaela vs Kevin Huang / David Li6-2, 6-2
2022-06-08vs David Park - GomezWon 20
W#1 SinglesJason Wallach vs Jose Ignacio Vega7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPaul Conklin / Joshua Forman vs Humberto Dascoli / Pedro El Khaouli6-1, 6-3
2022-05-18vs Sunrise - S.WilliamsWon 20
W#1 SinglesJason Wallach vs Angus Bain6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaul Conklin / Joseph Chapin vs Karson Volcy / Edward Ng6-2, 7-5
2022-05-11vs Broward/PerillaWon 10
W#1 SinglesJason Wallach vs Rafael Jacinto6-0, 6-3
2022-04-27vs David Park - GomezWon 20
W#1 DoublesAxel Sanchez / Stephan MacLaurin vs Nicolas Hernandez / Martin de Armas Armas6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJason Wallach vs Ivan Carrero6-2, 6-3
2022-04-20vs Heron Bay - KoretskyWon 10
W#1 SinglesJason Wallach vs Gaurang Shah6-2, 6-2
2022-04-13vs Wtc - JuniorWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Durgan / Stephan MacLaurin vs Roberto Palma / Carlos Mariscal6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJason Wallach vs Junior Carrasquero6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jason Wallach
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.81
Axel Sanchez
published 4
3.76
3.50
Joshua Forman
published
3.39
Stephan MacLaurin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
KHAI PHAN
published
3.22
Scott Sarbey
published
2.82
Paul Conklin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Edward Gaela
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Wallach + Joshua Forman314 matchesnot enough data
KHAI PHAN + Joshua Forman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jason Wallach
66W–27L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Axel Sanchez
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Christopher Beningo
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Joshua Forman
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Stephan MacLaurin
47W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
KHAI PHAN
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Scott Sarbey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Paul Conklin
34W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Edward Gaela
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.