Teams

Foehrkolb - Mishit Winners

2025 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2025-06-25vs Bailey/RasulWon 31
W#1 DoublesGeorge Sybert / David Kraus vs Michel Brooks Sr. / Chris Miller6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJon Roll / John Pettit vs Samee Ijaz / Xinzhe Ren6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKevin Foehrkolb vs Zac Walsh4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Warren / Jagannath Surampudi vs Samuel Sobkov / Kamran Rasul6-4, 6-3
2025-06-22vs Bailey/RasulSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoe Deleon / Rongfeng Li vs Tyce Henry / Xinzhe Ren3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / James Smith vs Sathya Narayanan / Alan Goodwich6-3, 6-1
2025-06-21vs Liu - StingRaysWon 10
W#1 DoublesFletcher Burchett / Jagannath Surampudi vs Rongfeng Li / Norbou Buchler6-3, 6-4
2025-06-18vs Bailey/RasulWon 20
W#1 DoublesRongfeng Li / David Kraus vs Mike Bailey / Sathya Narayanan6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKevin Foehrkolb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-09vs LewisLost 01
L#1 SinglesKevin Foehrkolb vs Anthony Hoffman0-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs Bailey/RasulWon 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Jagannath Surampudi vs Tyce Henry / Mike Bailey6-3, 6-4
2025-05-18vs Bailey/RasulSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Joseph Andrews vs Calvin Braxton II / Zac Walsh5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJon Roll / David Kraus vs Tyce Henry / Xinzhe Ren7-6, 6-4
2025-05-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesBruce Matthews / Kevin Foehrkolb vs Kevin Lee / James Stopka6-4, 6-2
2025-05-08vs Bailey/RasulLost 01
L#1 DoublesJon Roll / Rongfeng Li vs Calvin Braxton II / Colin Exelby2-6, 3-6
2025-05-07vs LewisLost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Craig Reed vs Alaukik Gupta / Ken Davis4-6, 6-7
2025-05-01vs Bailey/RasulWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorge Sybert / Rongfeng Li vs Greg Lessans / Jianjun Wang6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJon Roll / Joe Deleon vs Samee Ijaz / Xinzhe Ren6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Oliver Crain vs Michel Brooks Sr. / Sathya Narayanan6-1, 6-2
2025-04-27vs Bailey/RasulWon 30
W#1 DoublesJon Roll / Edmond Pittman vs Jianjun Wang / Alan Goodwich3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGeorge Sybert / David Kraus vs Donald Scarlett / Kamran Rasul6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Oliver Crain vs Sathya Narayanan / Colin Exelby6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Bailey/RasulWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoe Deleon / Jagannath Surampudi vs Zac Walsh / Calvin Braxton II4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGeorge Sybert / Rongfeng Li vs Tyce Henry / Michel Brooks Sr.6-0, 6-1
2025-04-17vs Liu - StingRaysLost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Craig Reed vs John Brakebill / Rongfeng Li7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Brooks Thacker
published 3.5
3.45
David Warren
published 3.5
3.40
Joe Deleon
published
3.39
George Sybert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Abraham Anonuevo
published 3.5
3.35
Jagannath Surampudi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
David Kraus
published 3.5
3.23
Oliver Crain
published
3.21
Kevin Foehrkolb
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 3.5
3.17
Jon Roll
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Rongfeng Li
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.08
Edmond Pittman
published
3.06
John Pettit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Foehrkolb + Jagannath Surampudi3354% gamesnot enough data
Rongfeng Li + Jagannath Surampudi314 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Foehrkolb + Jon Roll044 matchesnot enough data
Rongfeng Li + Kevin Foehrkolb123 matchesnot enough data
Rongfeng Li + George Sybert213 matchesnot enough data
Rongfeng Li + Jon Roll033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooks Thacker
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
David Warren
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Joe Deleon
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
George Sybert
233W–163L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Abraham Anonuevo
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Jagannath Surampudi
296W–330L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
David Kraus
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Oliver Crain
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Kevin Foehrkolb
50W–90L career · 10 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Jon Roll
32W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Rongfeng Li
120W–164L career · 9 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Edmond Pittman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
John Pettit
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.