Teams

LLW - Bako - Team Wetterholm

2023 Adult 55 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 8.0 - Bake

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-02-26vs Bako - Team RhodesWon 10
W#2 DoublesSally Goossen / Beth van Voorhis vs Laura Amason / Ronel Rabe7-6, 6-0
2023-01-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesSally Goossen / Beth van Voorhis vs Mary Wilkening / Laura Rice6-3, 6-2
2023-01-08vs Bako - Team RhodesWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Goossen / Beth van Voorhis vs Linette Holliday / Rhonda Slegers6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 8.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Beth van Voorhis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Amy Meger
published 4
3.40
Sally Goossen
published
3.33
Carol Maier
published 3.5
3.16
Beverly Wetterholm
published 3.5
2.97
Jeannie Munn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannie Munn + Beverly Wetterholm213 matchesnot enough data
Beth van Voorhis + Sally Goossen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth van Voorhis
39W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amy Meger
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Sally Goossen
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
3.5
Carol Maier
5W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Beverly Wetterholm
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Jeannie Munn
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.97
Imelda Ceja-Butkiewicz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.