Teams

RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AW4.5A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Noa Ramo-Larios
published
4.29
Chandra Thomas
published 4.5
4.21
Kiran F Narsinh
published
4.12
Alexandra Gunnell
published 4.5
4.10
Noriko Swanson
published
4.00
Jill Schepmann
published
3.96
Marina Wills
published
3.95
Flor Salinas
published
3.92
Nancy Wilson
published
3.89
Caitlin Finnell
published 4.5
3.87
Euna Roh
published
3.79
Jill Van Slyke
published
3.76
Donna Himenez
published
3.71
Babe Franey
published 4
3.57
Melissa Heng Steele
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chandra Thomas + Noa Ramo-Larios3346% games+3.8% vs expected
Donna Himenez + Nancy Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Wilson + Jill Van Slyke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Kiran F Narsinh
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
4.21
4.5
Alexandra Gunnell
29W–16L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
Noriko Swanson
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.10
Jill Schepmann
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Marina Wills
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.96
Flor Salinas
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
Nancy Wilson
21W–28L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.92
4.5
Caitlin Finnell
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
Euna Roh
23W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.79
Donna Himenez
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Babe Franey
16W–22L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Melissa Heng Steele
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.