Teams

LB Houston/O'Brien W3.0S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesGina Hancock / Jennifer Taffe vs Ann Lutich / Amy Robles3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDanielle Annamalai / Kim Houlne vs April Scopa / Holly Stroud6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Goodrich / Kelly Mitchell vs Janet Parham / Eugenie Rogers6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Goodrich / Kim Houlne vs Kathleen Hoedebeck / Lexie Burke7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMerry Dimanh / Sharon Mistry vs Teresa Chan-Leveno / Dionne Flynn6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-06vs Huffhines/Burns-Briggs W3.0SLost 12
W#2 DoublesMerry Dimanh / Kim Houlne vs Claire Chambers / Deena Chavoya-ellis6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTricia Plumb vs Yinru Huang3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Miller / Delia Stein vs Rebecca Hawkenson / Tania Holley3-6, 0-6
2026-05-30vs Thorntree/Dorrough-George W3.0SWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Taffe / Lauren Shaw vs Andrea Alva / Amber Rogers6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTricia Plumb vs Lisa Tran2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSharon Mistry / Merry Dimanh vs Keiara Bush / Ashley Dennis7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Mitchell / Delia Stein vs Mirtha Brown / Jennie Tai7-5, 6-4
2026-05-23vs Greenhill/McGinley-Lagoda W3.0SWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim Houlne / Tricia Plumb vs Lesley Lurie / Cecilia Perez-Verdia6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Miller / Delia Stein vs Samantha Curtis / Krissy Loerch6-1, 6-3
2026-05-16vs DAC/White W3.0SWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Houlne / Tricia Plumb vs Mary Kilany / Brittany Puryear6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDanielle Annamalai / Jennifer Taffe vs Stephanie Hain / Haley Thomas7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Miller / Sharon Mistry vs Veronica Erickson / Kristin Shackelford0-6, 0-6
2026-05-09vs Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0SLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Annamalai / Dawn Goodrich vs Grisel Diaz / Cynthia Savelli0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMerry Dimanh / Kim Houlne vs Tricia Djukanovich / Rani Khamesra6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Mitchell / Delia Stein vs Paige Burns / Tea Threatt4-6, 4-6
2026-05-02vs Samuell Grand/SusmanW3.0SWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Mays / Jennifer Taffe vs Sarah Rahm / Laura Kopf6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Goodrich / Gina Hancock vs Michelle Owens / Monica Susman6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Evans / Sharon Mistry vs Brandi Askenase / Missy Wall6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Linda Neukirchner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Tricia Plumb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.94
Danielle Annamalai
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Delores Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3
2.90
Kim Houlne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Nicole Peer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.88
Jennifer Taffe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Dawn Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Sharon Mistry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Delia Stein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Merry Dimanh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Plumb + Delores Rodriguez5160% games+9.9% vs expected
Delores Rodriguez + Dawn Goodrich5945% games−7.2% vs expected
Linda Neukirchner + Delores Rodriguez4450% gamesnot enough data
Kim Houlne + Tricia Plumb303 matchesnot enough data
Kim Houlne + Dawn Goodrich123 matchesnot enough data
Kim Houlne + Merry Dimanh303 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Mistry + Delia Stein213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Neukirchner + Dawn Goodrich123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Neukirchner
19W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Tricia Plumb
14W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Danielle Annamalai
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Delores Rodriguez
41W–39L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kim Houlne
25W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Nicole Peer
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jennifer Taffe
17W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Dawn Goodrich
15W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Sharon Mistry
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Delia Stein
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
2.58
Merry Dimanh
9W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.