Teams

Glenview Village Volley Girls

2026 Marion Adult 55 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Sunday

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-22vs FK WalshWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn-Marie Chouinard / Judy Hoops vs Mary Jeanne Walsh / Carmen Rosario3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Mary Meek vs Marianne Zitnick / Michele Duffy6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie Turner / Susie Day vs Marianne Marcoux / Natalie Petsche7-5, 6-3
2026-03-07vs FK 55+ 7.0 GREENE TEAMWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelanie Turner / Terry Sturm vs Jennifer Halinski / Terri Lowery6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJudy Hoops / Ann-Marie Chouinard vs Caroline Murray / Raksha Ramkissoon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJill Eng / Sandy Shapiro vs Maggie Berardi / Heidi Yates5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Glenview PerkinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Shapiro / Ann-Marie Chouinard vs Dina Sapienza / Marcia Plante6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Lee / Margaret Mis vs Sally Perkins / Diane Cassidy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Bosco / Susie Day vs Robin Lancaster / Robin Zink6-1, 6-0
2026-02-15vs SkyviewWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Nathan / Julie Davidson vs Lynne Finman / Maureen Maloney6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Bosco / Susie Day vs Rita Meek / Carol Hirsch6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Meek / Mime Ichini-Lurie vs Irma Buttermore / Beatrice Barlet6-4, 6-0
2026-02-13vs FK WalshWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Lee / Margaret Mis vs Marianne Marcoux / Kimberly Scudder Thompson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Mary Meek vs Rebecca Durham / Michele Duffy5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Bosco / Judy Hoops vs Jan Cole / Barbara Slatton6-1, 6-1
2026-02-08vs FK Queens of the CourtWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Lee / Margaret Mis vs Georgina Bumpas / Wendy MacMurray6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerry Sturm / Melanie Turner vs Margarita Posada / Gwen Ehler6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Bosco / Judy Hoops vs Michelle Smith / Jovita Hentz6-0, 6-3
2026-01-25vs Glenview PerkinsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Meek / Mime Ichini-Lurie vs Catherine Sersen / Sally Perkins6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Nathan / Julie Davidson vs Maria AnneDiOrio / Kim Ligon6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJudy Hoops / Ann-Marie Chouinard vs Marilu Burden / Maricel Keiter7-6, 6-4
2026-01-24vs Marion/HaynesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Eng / Diane Josselyn vs Deborah Borge-Shaffer / Kathy Hatfield4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Davidson / Michelle Nathan vs Julie Haynes / Carol Mecca3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Sturm / Melanie Turner vs Donna Jarvis / Ellen Perrone6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Mime Ichini-Lurie
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Michelle Nathan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Sandy Shapiro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Judy Hoops
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Ann-Marie Chouinard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Diane Josselyn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Lisa Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Jill Eng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Julie Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Terry Sturm
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Mary Meek
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
2.93
Melanie Turner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Elizabeth Bosco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Margaret Mis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susie Day
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Sturm + Melanie Turner162647% games−3.2% vs expected
Judy Hoops + Ann-Marie Chouinard8554% games−4.2% vs expected
Mime Ichini-Lurie + Mary Meek404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Nathan + Julie Davidson213 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Mis + Lisa Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Judy Hoops + Elizabeth Bosco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mime Ichini-Lurie
69W–61L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.99
Michelle Nathan
41W–42L career · 6 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Sandy Shapiro
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Ann-Marie Chouinard
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Diane Josselyn
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Lee
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jill Eng
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Julie Davidson
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Terry Sturm
34W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Mary Meek
20W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Melanie Turner
40W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
Elizabeth Bosco
7W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Mis
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susie Day
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.