Teams

2-LKieffer-UNC

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Rebekah Farris
published
2.96
2.87
LAURIE KIEFFER
usually #2 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 3
2.86
Anne Heymann
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Lauren Zedek
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Jennifer Gates-Foster
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.13
Leah Sansbury
published
Holly Madariaga
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Heymann + Lauren Zedek4352% games+7.6% vs expected
LAURIE KIEFFER + Rebekah Farris5650% games+1.7% vs expected
LAURIE KIEFFER + Anne Heymann5444% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Gates-Foster + Anne Heymann4163% gamesnot enough data
LAURIE KIEFFER + Lauren Zedek2336% gamesnot enough data
Rebekah Farris + Lauren Zedek314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebekah Farris
39W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Brienne Caranasos
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
LAURIE KIEFFER
70W–74L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Anne Heymann
57W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Lauren Zedek
37W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Jennifer Gates-Foster
56W–80L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Leah Sansbury
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Holly Madariaga
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.