← Teams

VTC-Darling

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Sharon Loomis-Malin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Lynn Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results5 ties
2020-11-07Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesPatti Dybdahl / Lynn Hendrix vs Sarah Bradley / Christina Gibson6-3, 6-0
2020-10-17Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSharon Loomis-Malin / Lynn Hendrix vs Della Shanley / Nancy Williams6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTrish Carder / Teresa Darling vs Julia Hall / Laura Laney6-1, 6-4
2020-10-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesSharon Loomis-Malin / Lynn Hendrix vs Julie Bradford / Gina Ariosa6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Trish Carder vs Ann Cassin / Anna Boyarshinova6-2, 7-6
2020-09-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTeresa Darling / Sharon Loomis-Malin vs Eileen Hart / Kathy Johnson6-4, 6-3
2020-09-20Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTeresa Darling / Sharon Loomis-Malin vs Chrys Culver / Sharon Vipond6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynn Hendrix / Patricia Nierenberg vs Shella Razon-Lumetta / Jacqui Slominski6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Sharon Loomis-Malin
60W–33L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Lynn Hendrix
56W–47L career
11%89%0%
3.12
3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.