Teams

2 Avalon Ghita

2023 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-30vs 5 Bon Air MorrisLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Caputo / Brad Williamson vs Matthew Morris / William Falls1-6, 2-6
2023-08-19vs 3 ACAC Delisio Destruction CrewWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Calhoun / Brad Williamson vs Jonathan Meade / William Fields7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-13vs 7 Westwood Brickley ThunderstruckWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Bland / Brad Williamson vs Robert Nilson / Sean DiBlasi6-3, 6-4
2023-08-12vs 1 TCRC Parks DrillersLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrad Williamson / Richard Bland vs Jeremy Theisen / Bo Bowden4-6, 0-6
2023-07-22vs 4 Wyndham Warriors HouffWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Caputo / Richard Bland vs Brian Zollinhofer / Bert Foreman6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.44
Robert Calhoun
published
3.44
Andrew Armstrong
published 3.5
3.40
Ian Shupack
published
3.37
Gabriel Ghita
published 3.5
3.31
Brad Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.31
Richard Bland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Todd Mungo
published
3.16
Vikram Nagulan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Ghita + Robert Calhoun7163% games+5.6% vs expected
Brad Williamson + Richard Bland241253% gamesnot enough data
Gabriel Ghita + Richard Bland1442% gamesnot enough data
Brad Williamson + Gabriel Ghita123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Christopher Caputo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Calhoun
27W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Andrew Armstrong
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Ian Shupack
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Gabriel Ghita
136W–77L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Brad Williamson
176W–167L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Todd Mungo
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Vikram Nagulan
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.