Teams

SHC-Zielinski

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Lisa Gray
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Steve Bidwell
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.11
Sue Gregoire
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Karen Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Xia Wu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Darrell Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Bill Rhoades
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.33
Babette Zielinski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Geoffrey Schwind
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Ronald Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-12-01Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDarrell Hawkins / Karen Sullivan vs John Barbieri / Pamela Buckley6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRonald Jackson / Babette Zielinski vs Sanja Lemes / James Feeney6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Lisa Gray vs Mike Mon / Tara Henderson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2018-11-11Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDarrell Hawkins / Karen Sullivan vs Nathaniel Israel / Yuko Hopman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTanya O'Neil / Bill Rhoades vs Claudia Ciobanu / Nathan Austin6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesXia Wu / Steve Bidwell vs Yuya Fujii / Kerstin Anderson6-4, 6-3
2018-10-28Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBill Rhoades / Sue Gregoire vs Kristin Fudalla / Nathaniel Israel5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Gray / Darrell Hawkins vs Nathan Austin / Claudia Ciobanu4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRonald Jackson / Karen Sullivan vs Chiho Cronk / Brendan Cunningham6-3, 6-4
2018-10-20Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Darrell Hawkins vs Emily Townsend / Charles Gates6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Xia Wu vs Mary Klinger / Matthew Casey6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2018-10-14Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBill Rhoades / Tanya O'Neil vs Emily Townsend / Eugene Jung6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGeoffrey Schwind / Xia Wu vs Charles Gates / Mary Klinger7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Lisa Gray vs Siamak Hajarizadeh / Jackie Dooris7-6, 6-3
2018-10-06Split 11
W#2 DoublesBill Rhoades / Tanya O'Neil vs Colleen Sharkey / Jack Yothers6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Sue Gregoire vs Patrick Jou / Sally Murdoch6-3, 6-4
2018-09-30Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Eric Ledwith vs Stephen Robertson / Amiee Moyers6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Lisa Gray vs Ke Ounaphom / Amanda Solomon6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDarrell Hawkins / Traci Palo vs Mike Robertson / Shannon DeVall6-2, 6-2
2018-09-23Split 11
L#2 DoublesLisa Gray / Steve Bidwell vs Faith Grisham / John Hunter6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBill Rhoades / Tanya O'Neil vs Christy Grisham / David Sturdyvin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Lisa Gray
90W–56L career
not enough data
4.5
Steve Bidwell
60W–68L career
not enough data
4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
3%97%0%
4.11
4.5
Karen Sullivan
62W–81L career
12%88%0%
4.02
4.5
Xia Wu
54W–79L career · type A
33%67%0%
3.92
4
Darrell Hawkins
26W–34L career
not enough data
4
Bill Rhoades
79W–87L career
43%57%0%
3.46
3.5
Babette Zielinski
52W–66L career
0%97%3%
3.33
0
Geoffrey Schwind
10W–5L career
not enough data
0
Ronald Jackson
8W–27L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.