Teams

MC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-30vs MVCC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesAllison Abrams / Elsa Zimmerer vs Madeleine Futterman / Danielle Rooney2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatherine Ashley vs Meg Flowers6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesGina Cozza / Wendy Towber vs Kristin Mazzarese / Sara Dwiggins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEmma Tiernon vs Christyn Benzle7-6, 6-4
2022-05-23vs LTC BLUEWon 50
W#1 DoublesAllison Abrams / Molly Burke vs Tracy Hagelund / Kathy Schoettler6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEmma Tiernon vs Megan Lewis6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Ashley / Elsa Zimmerer vs Angela Messinger / Linda Nielander7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesWendy Towber vs Kimberly Hitchcock6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Coleman / Gina Cozza vs Diane Hartman / Anya Civitella6-3, 6-4
2022-05-16vs RHCC BLUEWon 50
W#1 DoublesMolly Burke / Allison Abrams vs Kari Eckert / Briana Jackson7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKatherine Ashley vs Jill Haug6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Hitchner - (DQ)* / Elsa Zimmerer vs Terri Whitehair / Beth Trammell6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEmma Tiernon vs Heidi Wendling6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Coleman / Wendy Towber vs Erin Jackman / Tiffany Skiles6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-09vs NJ ORANGEWon 32
W#1 DoublesAllison Abrams / Molly Burke vs Rachel Eng / Debbie Lipski6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLauren Hitchner vs Denise Champion6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Coleman / Wendy Towber vs Tara Hammar / Mollie Toth1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesElsa Zimmerer vs Jennifer Davis6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCaroline Pattesron / Sarah Kublanow vs Stephanie Shawn / Christine Loehr3-6, 1-2
2022-05-02vs HIW GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesSarah Kublanow / Caroline Pattesron vs Reid Thompson / Daphne Taber1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKatherine Ashley vs Angela Appleby6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Coleman / Lauren Hitchner vs Shena Cothran / Amy Long6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesEmma Tiernon vs Ira Chang-Richmond6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGina Cozza / Wendy Towber vs CAROLINE MCQUEEN / Christy Schoonover3-6, 1-6
2022-04-25vs MVCC GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesMolly Burke / Allison Abrams vs Angela Mays / Kate Colon7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Hitchner vs Kristin Mazzarese6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmma Tiernon / Katherine Ashley vs Danielle Rooney / Debra O'Donnell6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesGina Cozza vs Molly Nelson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCaroline Pattesron / Sarah Kublanow vs Marci Grant / Sara Dwiggins6-4, 6-3
2022-04-18vs LTC BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesEmma Tiernon / Katherine Ashley vs Kathy Schoettler / Tracy Hagelund1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesWendy Towber vs Megan Lewis2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMolly Burke / Allison Abrams vs Kimberly Hitchcock / Linda Nielander6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesGina Cozza vs Raney Kilgore5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElsa Zimmerer / Laura Coleman vs Diane Hartman / Anya Civitella2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Allison Abrams
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.44
Molly Burke
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.30
Lauren Hitchner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Emma Tiernon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.89
Elsa Zimmerer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Gina Cozza
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Caroline Pattesron
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Katherine Ashley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Kublanow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Wendy Towber
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Abrams + Molly Burke39166% games+10.7% vs expected
Emma Tiernon + Katherine Ashley8461% games+6.6% vs expected
Caroline Pattesron + Sarah Kublanow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Abrams
63W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
Molly Burke
59W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Lauren Hitchner
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Emma Tiernon
53W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Elsa Zimmerer
43W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
2.5
Gina Cozza
6W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Caroline Pattesron
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Ashley
38W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Kublanow
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Towber
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.