Teams

TDC Shafer

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend 4.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Captain Morgan's Stand at BelmontWon 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Carli / Robert Clarkson vs Alex Neuwelt / John Chenault V6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-13vs WW Legends - BakerLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Carli / Michael Shafer vs Dale Nowery / Carter King1-6, 4-6
2025-07-12vs WW Legends - BakerLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Carli / Randy Biltz vs Patrick Gee / Robert Quinn4-6, 2-6
2025-07-06vs Captain Morgan's Stand at BelmontLost 01
L#2 DoublesByron Holmes / William Carli vs Jason Voigt / Scott Kim3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-28vs Captain Morgan's Stand at BelmontLost 01
L#4 DoublesTimothy Sherman / William Carli vs Alex Neuwelt / Warren Smigo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-22vs WW Legends - BakerLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Carli / Robert Clarkson vs Fred Walker / James Council6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
David Lefkowitz
published 4.5
4.23
Byron Holmes
published 4.5
4.23
Tom Bryan
published
4.20
Mark Knee
published
4.17
Randy Biltz
published
4.15
Gary Farrar
published 4.5
4.05
Robert Clarkson
published
4.01
William Carli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.00
Joseph Cappellino
published
3.97
Tejas Raval
published
3.95
Michael Shafer
published
3.86
Sean Reynolds
published
3.80
Scott Sorkin
published
3.75
William Pilc
published
3.60
Timothy Sherman
published
3.54
Joe Basil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Bryan + Gary Farrar4161% games+2.2% vs expected
Scott Sorkin + Joe Basil224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Lefkowitz
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Byron Holmes
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Tom Bryan
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Mark Knee
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Randy Biltz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Gary Farrar
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
Robert Clarkson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
William Carli
75W–68L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.01
Joseph Cappellino
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
Tejas Raval
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Michael Shafer
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
Sean Reynolds
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
Scott Sorkin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
William Pilc
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
Timothy Sherman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.60
Joe Basil
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.