Teams

CP ORANGE

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-17vs CP PURPLEWon 20
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Schlichting / Amanda Wootton vs Erica Bramlet / Matthew Hooper7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Shappell / Joshua Simmons vs Sarah Marks / Ryan Lane6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-05vs GTC NAVYWon 20
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Schlichting / Megan Abeyta vs KC Nettleton / Martin Froehlich6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSasha Pachnev / Angie Shappell vs Michelle Degitis / Craig Stromberg6-4, 3-3
2024-04-28vs JCC GOLDLost 01
L#3 DoublesMegan Abeyta / Christopher Morley vs Adam Koszowski / Michelle Topf3-6, 0-1
2024-04-21vs BVP NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Yokomichi / Debbie Lathrop vs Vu Tran / Kelsey Berlin4-6, 2-6
2024-04-07vs DTC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Alexander / Amanda Wootton vs Caleb Ray / Jennifer Mele5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTodd Yokomichi / Debbie Lathrop vs Heather Reimann / Adam Burbary7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Erin Raleigh
published
4.41
Joshua Simmons
published
4.38
4.35
Amanda Wootton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.33
Tobie Timmermans
published
4.18
Megan Abeyta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Debbie Lathrop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Angie Shappell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Melissa Doidge
published
Sasha Pachnev
published
Todd Yokomichi
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Raleigh
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.44
Joshua Simmons
23W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
4.41
4.5
Benjamin Schlichting
35W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
Amanda Wootton
89W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
4.35
Tobie Timmermans
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
4.33
4.5
Megan Abeyta
61W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Debbie Lathrop
131W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.11
4
Angie Shappell
103W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Melissa Doidge
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sasha Pachnev
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Yokomichi
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.