Teams

UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 40AM4.0A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jason Matlof
published
3.94
Mike Jawetz
published
3.89
Tom Brehme
published
3.85
Mahi DeSilva
published
3.81
Nathan Walker
published
3.80
Keith Koegler
published
Alain Boussard
published 4
3.69
Michael Kieschnick
published
3.63
Craig Jorasch
published 4
3.56
Dinraj Shetty
published
3.46
Lawrence Garlick
published
3.39
David Parekh
published 3.5
3.14
Don Sung
published
3.12
Jeongsup Shim
published
Gregory Engel
published
Jason Oliger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Koegler + Michael Kieschnick2352% gamesnot enough data
Mike Jawetz + Michael Kieschnick314 matchesnot enough data
Tom Brehme + Jason Matlof134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Matlof
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
Mike Jawetz
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
Tom Brehme
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.89
Mahi DeSilva
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Nathan Walker
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Keith Koegler
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Alain Boussard
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Kieschnick
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Craig Jorasch
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Dinraj Shetty
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Lawrence Garlick
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
David Parekh
50W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
Don Sung
1W–25L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Jeongsup Shim
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Gregory Engel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Oliger
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.