Teams

Malibu Racqueteers

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

20 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Courtney Miller-Jones
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Denise Peak
published 3.5
3.24
Myriam Marques
published
3.16
Andrea Rader
published 3.5
3.10
Tammy Sue Roberts
published
3.04
Margery Teller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Anne Star
published 3.5
2.99
Brenda Gillis
published 3.5
2.97
2.91
Rhonda Mosser
published
2.85
Lindsay Ignatczyk
published
2.77
Wendy Crump
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Renee Anderson
published
2.73
Wendy Nickerson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Cynthia Welles
published 3
2.52
Tes MacAraya
published
Fiona Corrigan
published
Holly Culhane
published
Joanne Blum
published
Petra Klane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Crump + Wendy Nickerson7953% games+8.0% vs expected
Margery Teller + Wendy Nickerson4151% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Crump + Denise Peak224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Courtney Miller-Jones
46W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Denise Peak
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Myriam Marques
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Andrea Rader
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Tammy Sue Roberts
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Margery Teller
81W–87L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Anne Star
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Brenda Gillis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Yvonne Esquerra-Bard
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Rhonda Mosser
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Lindsay Ignatczyk
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Wendy Crump
47W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Renee Anderson
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Wendy Nickerson
43W–122L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cynthia Welles
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Tes MacAraya
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Fiona Corrigan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Holly Culhane
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joanne Blum
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Petra Klane
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.