Teams

JTun

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Zargo / Michele Storr vs Gayle Aiken / Jeannie Nelms6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-10-04vs NRubinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Tulenko / Susan Goodman vs Catherine Poulter / Theresa Rosario-Jansen6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatty Seymour / Ginger Sidoti vs Karen Cody / Susan Starnes2-6, 2-6
2022-09-27vs KLamb55Won 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Schuette / Michele Storr vs Vanessa Manuel / Jo Ann Novak6-1, 6-2
2022-09-20vs LStradlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Tulenko / Michele Storr vs Kelly Foglia / Myra Peterson6-4, 6-4
2022-09-13vs ALyon/Fred 55+ 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Tulenko / Michele Storr vs Carolyn Elliott / Kelly Johnson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-30vs NRubinLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Garcia / Patty Seymour vs Dawn Johnstone / Nadine Rubin4-6, 3-6
2022-08-23vs KLamb55Won 30
W#1 DoublesChris Buscher / Patty Seymour vs Jo Ann Novak / Kimberly Lamb6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Schuette / Michele Storr vs Helen Michaels / Jeanne Russell6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Tulenko / Susan Goodman vs Laurie Leach / Bethany Stempien6-2, 6-0
2022-08-16vs LStradlingLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Sweitzer / Jennifer Tun vs Jan Copeland / Kelly Foglia1-6, 6-7
2022-08-09vs ALyon/Fred 55+ 6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Storr / Elizabeth Schuette vs Anne Boney / Shirley Chapman1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChris Buscher / Patty Seymour vs Cheryl Kata / Diana Kennedy3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Elizabeth Schuette
published 3.5
2.97
Michele Storr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.87
Mary Tulenko
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Jennifer Tun
published
2.59
Cheryl Sweitzer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Elly Siggins
published 3
2.55
Kelly Zargo
published
2.40
Patty Seymour
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Tulenko + Michele Storr4447% games−2.1% vs expected
Mary Tulenko + Cheryl Sweitzer5842% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Sweitzer + Michele Storr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Schuette
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Michele Storr
90W–76L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Mary Tulenko
83W–114L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Jennifer Tun
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Cheryl Sweitzer
57W–118L career · 1 line in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Elly Siggins
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
2.59
Kelly Zargo
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
2.5
Patty Seymour
56W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%78%22%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.