Teams

PD55/Graham/PTC

2025 STA Adult Combo 55 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Amanda Lane
published 3.5
3.32
Kay Zobrist
published
3.26
Jean Witt
published
3.18
Raquel Lastimoso
published
3.06
Betsy Graham
published 3.5
3.03
Lynn Dukes
published
2.98
Pamela Cody
published
2.92
Lyndy Graham
published
2.82
Pamela Weinberg
published
2.76
Linda Freeman
published
2.64
Sandy Trexler
published
2.54
Melvina Chappell
published
2.46
Bonnie Disney
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Lane + Raquel Lastimoso5365% games+11.4% vs expected
Raquel Lastimoso + Kay Zobrist20168% games+9.9% vs expected
Pamela Cody + Raquel Lastimoso7071% games+6.2% vs expected
Pamela Weinberg + Pamela Cody16462% games−2.4% vs expected
Jean Witt + Betsy Graham4447% games−10.9% vs expected
Linda Freeman + Pamela Weinberg224 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Trexler + Linda Freeman213 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Graham + Lyndy Graham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Lane
33W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Kay Zobrist
77W–38L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Jean Witt
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Raquel Lastimoso
53W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Betsy Graham
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Lynn Dukes
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Pamela Cody
45W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Lyndy Graham
33W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Pamela Weinberg
39W–28L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Linda Freeman
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Sandy Trexler
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Melvina Chappell
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Bonnie Disney
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.