Teams

WRC:No Strings Attached:Debnath

2024 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.60 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-16vs NEW:You Got Served:KaplanWon 21
W#1 DoublesPallavi Debnath / Danalyn Katz vs Beth Cavanaugh / Jane Erbe6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnna Hertzman vs Aisa Aiyer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTori Cornish / Leigh Hartnagel vs Nicole Woeste / Ashley McManus2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesEmi Mills / Danalyn Katz vs Kathy Reale / Michele Markelon6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Connell / Sugey Zimmer vs Jen Landolt / Julia Snowden4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-06-23vs NEW:You Got Served:KaplanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPallavi Debnath / Sugey Zimmer vs Aisa Aiyer / Ashley McManus2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDanalyn Katz vs Beth Cavanaugh6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesAnna Hertzman / Pallavi Debnath vs ERICA COLTUN / Marisa Yohay1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesInga Tuluca / Laura Connell vs Samantha Kumar / Laura Huizi1-6, 0-6
2024-06-11vs NEW:You Got Served:KaplanLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Hertzman / Tori Cornish vs Erin Trask / Aisa Aiyer3-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDanalyn Katz vs Beth Cavanaugh6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesInga Tuluca / Pallavi Debnath vs Jane Erbe / Alison Howard4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAnna Hertzman / Lori Barshop vs Erica Winkler / Kathy Reale3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEmi Mills vs Marisa Pilipshen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Connell / Pallavi Debnath vs Jen Landolt / Michele Markelon6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTori Cornish / Emi Mills vs Jill Brant / Debra Miller6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLori Barshop vs Marisa Pilipshen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPallavi Debnath / Anna Hertzman vs Suzanne Duval / Julia Snowden5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesEmi Mills / Leigh Hartnagel vs Dana Jack / Michelle Fisher2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Hertzman vs Lilian Limon6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Connell / Alix FitzGerald vs ERICA COLTUN / Marisa Yohay2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club:Finkel/Leon0818612141
2WRC:No Strings Attached:Debnath0891431217
3MIT: 18+ 2.5's:Sikora/ Lorenzetti09171024213
4GF:Drop it like a Shot:Wang09141326203
5NEW:You Got Served:Kaplan09121432236
6TCT:Club Ed:Berson/Dellis09121533261
7MIT:Spintastic:Buschauer09111633229
8FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:Brant/Winkler09111635242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Emi Mills
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.37
Inga Tuluca
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.32
Lori Barshop
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.29
Leigh Hartnagel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Danalyn Katz
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.20
Anna Hertzman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Alix FitzGerald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.98
Laura Connell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Pallavi Debnath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sugey Zimmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tori Cornish
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Barshop + Leigh Hartnagel2446% games+0.9% vs expected
Lori Barshop + Pallavi Debnath3347% games−0.2% vs expected
Pallavi Debnath + Leigh Hartnagel1632% games−1.7% vs expected
Pallavi Debnath + Laura Connell1433% games−10.7% vs expected
Pallavi Debnath + Emi Mills314 matchesnot enough data
Lori Barshop + Laura Connell123 matchesnot enough data
Pallavi Debnath + Anna Hertzman033 matchesnot enough data
Laura Connell + Inga Tuluca033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emi Mills
30W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
2.5
Inga Tuluca
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.37
Lori Barshop
20W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.32
Leigh Hartnagel
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Danalyn Katz
4W–11L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Anna Hertzman
6W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Alix FitzGerald
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Laura Connell
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Pallavi Debnath
19W–73L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Sugey Zimmer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tori Cornish
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.