Teams

Lord of the Strings/Smith

2026 Team Singles 18+ SFV Winter · Spring

6 players · average NTRP / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-11vs LLW SFV Team SilverLost 01
L#2 SinglesJoo Hyung Oh vs Paul Getto0-6, 3-6
2026-03-28vs LLW SFV Team SilverSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJarvis Tait vs Jesse Gillan1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesRaj Hungund vs Jeremy Silver6-1, 6-1
2026-03-22vs LLW SFV Team SilverSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJonas Ehrlich vs Jesse Gillan1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesTrevor Angell vs Jeremy Silver6-1, 6-1
2026-03-15vs LLW SFV Team SilverSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRaj Hungund vs Nicholas Rinck5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJonas Ehrlich vs Alexander Luengo4-6, 3-6
2026-03-07vs LLW SFV Team SilverWon 20
W#2 SinglesTrevor Angell vs Nicholas Rinck6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJonas Ehrlich vs Jeremy Silver6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-01vs LLW SFV Team SilverLost 01
L#1 SinglesLukas Goh vs Alexander Luengo3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLW SFV Team Silver3310816123
2Lord of the Strings/Smith3381023164

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Trevor Angell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.06
Raj Hungund
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.83
Jonas Ehrlich
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jarvis Tait
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Joo Hyung Oh
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Lukas Goh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trevor Angell
12W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Raj Hungund
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Jonas Ehrlich
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Jarvis Tait
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joo Hyung Oh
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lukas Goh
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.