Teams

JVanCampen

2022 Cap Mixed 40 & over · 8.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-31vs GThayer RRC Mixed TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Robertson / John van Campen vs Heather Jayson / Luis Arcos3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarti May / Jason Sage vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Vedder / Aaron Vedder vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-30vs GThayer RRC Mixed TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn van Campen / Juli Korsnack vs Luis Arcos / Jeme Avent6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Vedder / Aaron Vedder vs Vagner Finelli / KATRINA SIZEMORE6-3, 6-4
2022-07-21vs GThayer RRC Mixed TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Gregory Gulden vs Helen Strickland / Damien Graham6-2, 6-2
2022-07-17vs BKOREN/HOLSCHERWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn van Campen / Michelle Vedder vs Benjamin Koren / Laura Capps6-1, 6-3
2022-06-26vs BKOREN/HOLSCHERLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Sage / Shelly Schiff vs Joe Ruggieri / Laura Capps1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn van Campen / Jennifer Robertson vs Brian Maher / Lindsey Klein1-6, 0-6
2022-06-05vs BKOREN/HOLSCHERLost 12
L#1 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Gregory Gulden vs Brian Maher / Lindsey Klein1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJason Sage / Erika Atkinson vs Paul Holscher / Stephanie Disbrow3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Vedder / Aaron Vedder vs Benjamin Koren / Emily Cutts6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Juli Korsnack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Jason Sage
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Kelly Hollis
published
3.34
John van Campen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Aaron Vedder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Michelle Vedder
published
Shelly Schiff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juli Korsnack + Jason Sage10361% games+1.6% vs expected
Juli Korsnack + John van Campen6262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Juli Korsnack
99W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Jason Sage
85W–136L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Kelly Hollis
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
John van Campen
144W–173L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Aaron Vedder
61W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Michelle Vedder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelly Schiff
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.