Teams

LWR Liquid Ranchers

2025 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall · 8.5 W Thursday

15 players · average NTRP 4.22 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-13vs Sarasota/Wilson/50&Over8.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Handel / Diana Stadelnikas vs Jennifer Bright / Linda Steen4-6, 0-6
2025-10-16vs Wild Blue ComboWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Christine Handel vs Celia Pena / Jacqueline Borden6-3, 6-3
2025-10-09vs Sarasota/Wilson/50&Over8.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Christine Handel vs Sally Alford / Kara Beene6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-08vs Plantation Rock LobstersLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Heidi Cox vs Kerry Distefano / Connie Weiss2-6, 2-6
2025-09-18vs LBK Public Island GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Frazier / Lori Faunce vs Dana Slackman / Joy Voke6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Carol Frazier
published 4.5
4.30
Christie Boylston
published 4.5
4.29
Allyson Hoffman
published 4.5
4.03
Kim Eck
published 4
3.87
Christine Handel
published 4
3.84
Heidi Cox
published 4
3.80
Elizabeth Goelz
published 4
3.79
Elizabeth Green
published 4.5
3.71
Sheila Perry
published
3.71
Karen Nicholson
published
3.71
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.69
Karen Spiegel
published
3.64
Karen Collins
published
3.42
Marcia Frost
published
Lori Faunce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Green + Allyson Hoffman2354% games+3.2% vs expected
Diana Stadelnikas + Kim Eck3352% gamesnot enough data
Karen Nicholson + Carol Frazier404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Frazier
18W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.51
4.5
Christie Boylston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Allyson Hoffman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.29
4
Kim Eck
56W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Christine Handel
26W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Heidi Cox
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Elizabeth Goelz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
4.5
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.79
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Karen Spiegel
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Karen Collins
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Marcia Frost
22W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Lori Faunce
41W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.