Teams

Roddy/18/DIII/TWD/NOLT

2023 NO Tri Level 18 & Over - Women Day · 4.5,4.0,3.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

23 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 NO (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Karen Eastman
published
4.41
Ginny Wirth
published
4.29
Elizabeth Wooten
published
Barbara Claiborne
published 4.5
3.96
Kathryn Talbot
published
3.91
Riley Kennedy
published
3.86
3.84
Katherine Saulsbury
published
3.68
Carrie Dunbar
published 4
3.55
Yvonne Keegan
published
3.49
Charlotte Meade
published 4
3.46
Marti Mcenery
published
3.43
Gretchen Drennan
published
3.39
Elizabeth Todd
published
3.37
Marlowe Maylin
published
3.31
Anna Breaux
published 3.5
3.30
Lauren Flower
published
3.19
JENNIFER CAPITELLI
published
3.14
Hannah Kohlman
published
Jill Nalty
published
Kim Roddy
published
MacHelle Payne
published
Meredith Montgomery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JENNIFER CAPITELLI + Anna Breaux3262% games+4.9% vs expected
Meredith Montgomery + Kim Roddy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Eastman
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.43
Ginny Wirth
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
4.41
Elizabeth Wooten
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Barbara Claiborne
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Talbot
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.96
Riley Kennedy
20W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Amy Macdiarmid Browne
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.86
Katherine Saulsbury
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Carrie Dunbar
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Yvonne Keegan
29W–30L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Charlotte Meade
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Marti Mcenery
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.46
Gretchen Drennan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.43
Elizabeth Todd
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Marlowe Maylin
15W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Anna Breaux
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Lauren Flower
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
JENNIFER CAPITELLI
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Hannah Kohlman
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Jill Nalty
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Roddy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
MacHelle Payne
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Montgomery
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.