Teams

ROLLING HILLS 18AW4.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
published
4.06
Maddie Thomas
published
3.95
Joanna Frazier
published
3.85
Anusuya Mokashi
published 4
3.78
Mira Schwirtz
published
3.77
Ana Dougherty
published 4
Catherine Diego
published 4
3.74
Pam Myers
published
3.70
3.63
Martina Hamamjian
published
3.52
Mary Gamble
published
3.48
Kathy Halligan
published
3.37
Nichelle Watkins
published
3.34
Annika Kahn
published 3
3.29
Miriam Sittenfeld
published
3.16
Tricia Hulsey
published 3.5
Quynh Pearson
published
Sara C Mazza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Frazier + Annie van Den Toorn4161% games+6.4% vs expected
Mary Gamble + Joanna Frazier224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Gamble + Kathy Halligan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
Maddie Thomas
61W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.06
Joanna Frazier
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Anusuya Mokashi
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Mira Schwirtz
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ana Dougherty
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Catherine Diego
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pam Myers
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Annie van Den Toorn
25W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Martina Hamamjian
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
Mary Gamble
22W–24L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Kathy Halligan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Nichelle Watkins
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.37
3
Annika Kahn
16W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.34
Miriam Sittenfeld
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.29
3.5
Tricia Hulsey
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Quynh Pearson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara C Mazza
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.