Teams

Z Park Combo

2026 Combo Doubles 18&Over-NE · Women 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs Corinth/FulghumWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshton Scarborough / Cooper Collins vs Susan Hand-Pina / Georgianna Robinson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Huckaby / Liz Couturiaux vs Jennifer Fulghum / Terri Amacker6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPerrish Dragovits / Kim Bailey vs Robin Elliott / Ashleigh Dalton7-5, 6-1
2026-08-25vs 5.5 BeckWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Barnitz / Martha Kate Stratton vs Jenna Wiygul / Haley Pate6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshton Scarborough / Liz Couturiaux vs Katy Riley / Whitney McNutt6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Huckaby / Heaven Day vs Miranda Conn / Kristen Turner Tucker1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-12vs Corinth/FulghumLost 12
W#1 DoublesPaige Russell / Tiffany Edwards vs Cathy McCullen / Tara Williams6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Bailey / Emily Decker vs Jennifer Fulghum / Doris Maness6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Zuelzke / Kiersten Bullock vs Margaret Orr / Taylor Moak3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
15.5 Beck2042445
2Corinth/Fulghum12451295
3Reynolds000000
4Z Park Combo0112430

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Ashton Scarborough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Elizabeth Barnitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Lauren Huckaby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Emily Decker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Lauren Zuelzke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Tiffany Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Heaven Day
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Kim Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.00
Kiersten Bullock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Liz Couturiaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Martha Kate Stratton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashton Scarborough
50W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Elizabeth Barnitz
33W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.76
Lauren Huckaby
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Emily Decker
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Lauren Zuelzke
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
Tiffany Edwards
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
Heaven Day
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kim Bailey
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Kiersten Bullock
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Liz Couturiaux
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Kate Stratton
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.