Teams

ATC VARGHESE

2026 FW Adult Mixed League 40 · 7.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-26vs ATC COLLIERWon 20
W#2 DoublesRick Chevalier / Natasha Chevalier vs Rindge Leaphart / Margaret Collier4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBARRY LANE / Elizabeth Varghese vs Joseph Collier / Angela Snow6-4, 6-2
2026-04-26vs HTC HOWARDLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Varghese / Frank Oliver vs Monthiene Sundara / Bang Le1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLara Lucas / Kent Rasmussen vs Hai Nguyen / Deborah Arnold1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDagmar Kopinski / Gerald Webb vs Sherri DeFraites / Christopher DeFraites0-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs ATC GERMANYLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Voss / Michael Voss vs Michael Love / Julie McGuire1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Oliver / Dagmar Kopinski vs Michelle Hyland / Brian Ownby1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Varghese / Deniz Serinken vs Daniel Morsch / Lorein Campbell1-6, 0-6
2026-03-29vs PPL MEHALL/CLARKLost 12
L#1 DoublesRick Chevalier / Natasha Chevalier vs Mike Mehall / Susan May4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKent Rasmussen / Elizabeth Varghese vs Keith Clark / Lori Clark2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Voss / Lori Voss vs Terry Morawski / Courtney Morawski6-2, 6-4
2026-03-29vs TCU SUDDERTHLost 12
W#1 DoublesLori Voss / Michael Voss vs Bonnie Sudderth / Alan Richbourg6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFrank Oliver / Tracey Kesterson vs Beth Grimes / Jim Robbins3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLara Lucas / Ali Adibi vs Natalia Hanson / Greg Hanson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-03-15vs RTC TRAMMELLLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrank Oliver / Dagmar Kopinski vs Najam Mirza / Allison Nicks6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGerald Webb / Lara Lucas vs Kul Shekhar / Adriana Colliton1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeniz Serinken / Elizabeth Varghese vs Allan Wilson / Cindy Trammell2-6, 1-6
2026-03-08vs HTC HOWARDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Voss / Lori Voss vs Hai Nguyen / Brittany Le4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKent Rasmussen / Dagmar Kopinski vs Kim Nguyen / Christopher DeFraites2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBARRY LANE / Elizabeth Varghese vs Renata Rodricks / Brian Rodricks1-6, 1-6
2026-03-01vs ATC COLLIERLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Voss / Lori Voss vs Kevin Huyen / Kilda Dever6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAli Adibi / Tracey Kesterson vs Joseph Collier / Margaret Collier2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBARRY LANE / Dagmar Kopinski vs Rindge Leaphart / Angela Snow2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Gerald Webb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Natasha Chevalier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Rick Chevalier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Tracey Kesterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Lara Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ali Adibi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Deniz Serinken
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Elizabeth Varghese
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.69
Dagmar Kopinski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.55
BARRY LANE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Frank Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kent Rasmussen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lori Voss
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Michael Voss
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Voss + Michael Voss4249% gamesnot enough data
Kent Rasmussen + Elizabeth Varghese033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gerald Webb
4W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Natasha Chevalier
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Rick Chevalier
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Tracey Kesterson
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Lara Lucas
10W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Ali Adibi
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Deniz Serinken
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Elizabeth Varghese
14W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Dagmar Kopinski
13W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
BARRY LANE
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Frank Oliver
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kent Rasmussen
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Voss
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Voss
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.