Teams

SGV For the LOVE of Balls-Um-Scholl/SA1

2025 Winter Team Singles · SGV - Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 SinglesKat Kim vs Kiera Nowacki6-1, 6-3
2025-03-15vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SUWon 21
W#1 SinglesJennifer Sung vs Deborah Kim6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesEfe Oghoghome vs Teresa Magsaysay6-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesLinda Lopez vs Jennifer Yu6-3, 7-6
2025-03-08vs SGV Hot Tub Tennis Club-Nowacki--WN/Split 11
L#2 SinglesHyon A Um vs Tina Lu2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesDoree Shafrir vs Candice Wu2-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Sung vs Sharon Cuff6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLinda Lopez vs Megan Eme6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKat Kim vs Su Li6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDoree Shafrir vs Sydney Angrand0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlexis Halejian vs Julia Arnold6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLourdes Duarte vs Angela Leung6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJennifer Sung vs Sydney Angrand6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLinda Lopez vs Patricia Ash1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Jennifer Sung
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.17
Stefani Galvagni
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.97
Alexis Halejian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.93
Linda Lopez
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Doree Shafrir
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.89
Kat Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.85
Lourdes Duarte
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.69
Karen Willaman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.45
Hyon A Um
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Efe Oghoghome
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefani Galvagni + Karen Willaman5549% games−4.8% vs expected
Stefani Galvagni + Hyon A Um3747% gamesnot enough data
Stefani Galvagni + Kat Kim7165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Sung
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Stefani Galvagni
129W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
3
Alexis Halejian
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Linda Lopez
27W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Doree Shafrir
93W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Kat Kim
50W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Lourdes Duarte
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Karen Willaman
64W–78L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Hyon A Um
66W–106L career · 1 line in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45
Efe Oghoghome
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.