Teams

Aikens, Adrienne

2026 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Women 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-15vs Williams, CindyWon 21
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Aikens / Carly Brown vs Anna Lucovich / Danette Tannehill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEverett Heard vs Ashley Markland4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Coffey / Tina Wells vs Cindy Martin Williams / Nikki Summers7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2026-04-08vs Renfrow, MeredithLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Coffey / Lisa Gemar vs Jordan Bryan / Melissa Kaye Mccombs0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKayli Rutland vs Anna Terry6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEverett Heard / Corinne Dickens vs Sarah Allen / Kayla Soukup3-6, 1-6
2026-04-01vs Mangum, EmilyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarly Brown / Tina Wells vs Lifang Yan / Kaytlin Benzel3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHaley Lowe vs Kelli Ford3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Coffey / Kristi Eldridge vs Mary Parker Plunkett / Kym Gore0-6, 1-6
2026-03-25vs Manuel, ElaineLost 12
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Aikens / Sandy Dickens vs Chrystal Gray / Kim Maureen Price7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRomy Abboud vs Stephanie Jierski2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Gemar / Corinne Dickens vs Elaine Manuel / Camille Horton2-6, 0-6
2026-03-18vs Reiss, BethLost 12
W#1 DoublesHaley Lowe / Adrienne Aikens vs Bridgett Perez / Julia Yermolovich6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKayli Rutland vs Amy Parkes4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTina Wells / Corinne Dickens vs Gracie King / Natella Boulton3-6, 1-6
2026-03-04vs Williams, CindyLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Coffey / Romy Abboud vs Ashley Markland / Nikki Summers7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKristi Eldridge vs Danette Tannehill3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Gemar / Everett Heard vs Lydia Walters / Emilie Lynn4-6, 1-6
2026-02-25vs Renfrow, MeredithLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandy Dickens / Corinne Dickens vs Anna Terry / Melissa Kaye Mccombs4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Coffey vs Jordan Bryan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTina Wells / Adrienne Aikens vs Cece Cottone / Tracy Rhinewalt3-6, 2-6
2026-02-18vs Mangum, EmilyLost 12
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Aikens / Kayli Rutland vs Kelli Ford / Kym Gore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristi Eldridge vs Mary Parker Plunkett0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarly Brown / Romy Abboud vs Mary Lauren Boykin / Merry Farris6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-11vs Manuel, ElaineLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristi Eldridge / Everett Heard vs Candice Ross / Camille Horton2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHaley Lowe vs Stephanie Jierski6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKayli Rutland / Carly Brown vs Chelsie Bethea / Chrystal Gray7-5, 6-3
2026-02-04vs Reiss, BethWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Gemar / Romy Abboud vs Amy Parkes / Gracie King1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHaley Lowe vs Natella Boulton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandy Dickens / Corinne Dickens vs Beth Reiss / Mandy Johnson7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Kelly Coffey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.38
Kayli Rutland
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.24
Sandy Dickens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.21
Carly Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
Haley Lowe
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.15
Adrienne Aikens
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.10
Corinne Dickens
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.04
Romy Abboud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.00
Everett Heard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.92
Tina Wells
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.85
Lisa Gemar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.79
Kristi Eldridge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Coffey
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
Kayli Rutland
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Sandy Dickens
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Carly Brown
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Haley Lowe
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Adrienne Aikens
8W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Corinne Dickens
1W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Romy Abboud
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Everett Heard
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Tina Wells
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Lisa Gemar
1W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Kristi Eldridge
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.