Teams

Hoobie’s Hombres

Adult 18 and over · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-27vs AceassinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDominic Ferraro / John Karaban vs Jose Meza Cuadra / Waldemar Jablonski3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDaniel Lynn vs Laszlo Szollas6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJorey Ferraro / Walt Karaban vs Michael Taylor / Shannon Woods0-6, 3-6
2026-06-20vs Valley Royale 4.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesDominic Ferraro / John Karaban vs James Petch / Timothy Zaborowski7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniel Lynn vs Samuel Lux6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJorey Ferraro / Jose Bordas vs Bayto Cokrlija / Cameron Tuck1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Soika vs Nathan Hawk3-6, 0-6
2026-06-13vs AceassinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesDominic Ferraro / John Karaban vs Isidoros Skarlis / Shannon Woods6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJorey Ferraro / Matthew Soika vs Laszlo Szollas / Troy Tomlinson5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJose Bordas / Walt Karaban vs Alexander Bell / Rodrigo Ayabe0-6, 0-6
2026-06-06vs The ReturnersLost 13
L#1 DoublesDominic Ferraro / John Karaban vs Matt Zaun / Brett Siegfried4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDaniel Lynn vs Jesse Vo6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJose Bordas / Juan Troncoso vs Andres Zirlinger / Javier Avila0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJorey Ferraro vs Eric Horowitz3-6, 4-6
2026-05-30vs The ReturnersLost 13
L#1 DoublesDominic Ferraro / John Karaban vs Cesar Pernia / Matt Zaun3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Lynn vs Jacob Nelson7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMatthew Soika / Jorey Ferraro vs Eric Horowitz / Julien Sauvagnargues4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesWalt Karaban vs Shashin Shah0-6, 1-6
2026-05-17vs AceassinsLost 23
W#1 DoublesDominic Ferraro / John Karaban vs Isidoros Skarlis / Shannon Woods4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniel Lynn vs Michael Sacks6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJorey Ferraro / Walt Karaban vs Jose Meza Cuadra / Michael Taylor0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Soika vs James Werder1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Vibert / Jose Bordas vs Alexander Bell / Todd Hoang0-6, 2-6
2026-04-17vs The ReturnersLost 04
L#1 DoublesDominic Ferraro / John Karaban vs Austin Hertzog / Brett Siegfried1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMatthew Soika vs Jesse Vo0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJorey Ferraro / Walt Karaban vs Evan Armstrong / Derek Kulp0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJose Bordas / Christopher Vibert vs Andreas Scherffel / Matt Zaun0-6, 1-6
2026-04-12vs Valley Royale 4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJohn Karaban / Dominic Ferraro vs Samuel Lux / Jared Smith2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Lynn vs James Petch6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMatthew Soika vs Cameron Tuck6-3, 6-3
2026-04-12vs Valley Royale 4.0Lost 05
L#1 DoublesDaniel Lynn / Jorey Ferraro vs Samuel Lux / David Michilashvili6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDominic Ferraro vs Bayto Cokrlija4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Karaban / Walt Karaban vs Timothy Zaborowski / Cameron Tuck1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Soika vs Tegan Durishin1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJuan Troncoso / Jose Bordas vs Nathan Hawk / James Petch0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Returners0939617262
2Valley Royale 4.009232248382
3Hoobie’s Hombres09123369482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Daniel Lynn
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
Christopher Vibert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Matthew Soika
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.55
Dominic Ferraro
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #1 Singles 11% · published
3.53
John Karaban
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
3.52
Jorey Ferraro
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
3.28
Walt Karaban
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Jose Bordas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Juan Troncoso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominic Ferraro + John Karaban3545% games+7.9% vs expected
Dominic Ferraro + Jorey Ferraro11036% gamesnot enough data
Jorey Ferraro + Walt Karaban033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Lynn
6W–1L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Christopher Vibert
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Soika
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Dominic Ferraro
4W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
John Karaban
3W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jorey Ferraro
4W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.52
Walt Karaban
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.28
Jose Bordas
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.19
Juan Troncoso
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.